Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Motorola Moto G32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 August 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 101.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 173 g 184 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.8 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 49.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Motorola Moto G32: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis that prioritizes user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GMotorola Moto G32User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED Plus, 120Hz Refresh RateIPS LCD, 90Hz Refresh RateM52 offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling for a more visually engaging experience.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 778G 5GSnapdragon 680 4GM52 provides significantly faster processing and 5G connectivity, leading to smoother multitasking and quicker app loading.
Accessibility FeaturesOne UI 3.1 (Android 11)My UX (Android 12)Both offer standard Android accessibility features, but specific implementations may vary. Further research is recommended for individual needs.
Design Ergonomics7.4mm thin, 173g8.5mm thin, 184gM52 is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a travel blogger capturing vibrant street scenes in a bustling city. The M52's superior AMOLED display brings those moments to life with vivid colors and sharp details, even under direct sunlight. Its faster processor ensures you won't miss a shot, quickly processing high-resolution images and videos. Meanwhile, the Moto G32, while capable, might struggle to keep pace with the demanding task of high-quality photo and video capture on the fly.

Scenario: You're a student attending online lectures and working on group projects simultaneously. The M52's powerful Snapdragon 778G processor and 5G connectivity allow seamless multitasking without lag. You can smoothly switch between video conferencing, research, and collaborative document editing. The G32's 4G connectivity and less powerful processor may result in buffering during video calls and slower app switching, potentially hindering productivity.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For the casual user: The Moto G32 offers a solid everyday experience at a more budget-friendly price.

For the power user: The M52's superior performance and display make it the clear winner for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

For the visually impaired: Both phones offer standard Android accessibility features. However, the M52's brighter, more vibrant display may provide a better experience for users with low vision.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G prioritizes performance and a premium visual experience. Its design philosophy caters to users who demand speed, responsiveness, and high-quality visuals.

The Motorola Moto G32 emphasizes affordability and essential functionality. Its design caters to users who prioritize basic smartphone features and budget-consciousness over top-tier performance.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M52 5G

While the Moto G32 is a commendable budget option, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. Its superior AMOLED display, significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 778G vs. Snapdragon 680), and 5G connectivity create a noticeably smoother and more engaging user experience. The slightly higher price tag is justified by the significant performance jump and enhanced visual quality, crucial for activities like mobile gaming, content consumption, and productivity. In the long run, the M52's future-proof 5G capabilities and robust performance ensure a more satisfying and lasting user experience. It aligns more closely with my values of prioritizing user experience, design innovation, and long-term value.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.