Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 173 g 174.9 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs. Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GMotorola Edge 50 FusionUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 3.1 (based on Android 11)My UX (based on Android 14)Motorola offers a cleaner, potentially more bloatware-free experience with the latest Android version.
Interaction Flow120Hz Super AMOLED Plus120/144Hz pOLEDBoth offer smooth scrolling; Motorola's potentially higher refresh rate (market dependent) offers a slight edge in visual fluidity.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 accessibilityEnhanced Android 14 accessibilityEdge 50 Fusion likely benefits from newer Android accessibility advancements, potentially offering a more inclusive experience.
Design ErgonomicsSide-mounted fingerprint sensorUnder-display fingerprint sensorPersonal preference; under-display sensors offer a cleaner aesthetic, while side-mounted can be quicker to access in certain grips.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional, Sarah, who relies heavily on her smartphone for both work and personal life.

  • Samsung Galaxy M52 5G: Sarah appreciates the vibrant Super AMOLED Plus display for viewing presentations and streaming videos during her commute. The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through emails and social media feel seamless. However, she sometimes finds the One UI interface a bit cluttered.
  • Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Sarah finds the clean aesthetic of My UX appealing. The potentially faster refresh rate on the Edge 50 Fusion provides an even smoother experience when multitasking between work apps. The latest Android features and enhanced accessibility options improve her overall productivity.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Diverse User Needs:

  • Tech-Savvy User: Might prefer the Motorola for its newer OS, potentially faster refresh rate, and cleaner interface.
  • Casual User: Both devices offer good performance for everyday tasks. The Samsung's vibrant display might be more appealing for media consumption.
  • User with Accessibility Needs: The Edge 50 Fusion, with its newer Android version, is likely to offer better accessibility features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Intuitive Comparison:

  • Modernity and Cleanliness: Edge 50 Fusion wins.
  • Visual Vibrancy: Galaxy M52 5G potentially has the edge with its Super AMOLED Plus display technology.
  • Future-Proofing: Edge 50 Fusion, with newer Android OS and chipset, is more future-proof.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G offers a compelling visual experience with its Super AMOLED Plus display, I would choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. Its cleaner software experience with My UX based on the latest Android 14, potentially higher refresh rate, more powerful processor, faster charging, and the promise of longer software updates make it a more compelling choice for the long term. The advancements in accessibility and overall user experience offered by the newer Android version align better with my philosophy of user-centered technology. The Edge 50 Fusion represents a more modern and future-proof option, promising a smoother, more enjoyable, and inclusive user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.