Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Huawei Mate X3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2021 April 8, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.83 cm³ 117.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.87 "/g 3.28 "/g
Weight 173 g 239 g
Height 164.2 mm 156.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 141.5 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 5.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black
  • Gold
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Dark Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 7.85 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 2224 x 2496
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 77.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.86 mAh/cm³ 40.79 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.2
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 11 N/A
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the Huawei Mate X3, focusing on the user experience rather than just raw specifications.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M52 5GHuawei Mate X3User Experience Impact
Form FactorStandard SlabFoldableThe Mate X3's foldable design offers versatility and portability, transforming from a phone to a tablet. This significantly impacts content consumption and productivity.
Interface DesignOne UI (Android 11)EMUI (HarmonyOS)Both offer customizable interfaces, but EMUI's potential lack of Google services might limit app availability and user familiarity for some.
Interaction FlowTraditional TouchFoldable & TouchThe Mate X3's folding mechanism introduces new interaction possibilities, like multitasking with split-screen apps, impacting productivity and user workflow.
AccessibilityStandard AndroidPotentially LimitedThe lack of Google services on the Mate X3 might impact accessibility features relying on Google integration.
Design ErgonomicsLightweight & SlimThicker when FoldedWhile the M52 is more pocketable, the unfolded Mate X3 provides a larger screen area for better content viewing and interaction, though with added weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for both taking notes in class and watching educational videos on the commute. The M52 5G offers a large, vibrant AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, making note-taking and video viewing enjoyable. However, the Mate X3 transforms the experience. On the commute, the student unfolds the device for a tablet-like viewing experience. In class, they can fold it halfway and use it like a laptop, taking notes on one half of the screen while referencing material on the other.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: Tech-Savvy Professional: Both phones offer powerful processors for demanding tasks. However, the professional might prefer the Mate X3's innovative foldable design and potential for enhanced productivity, even with the HarmonyOS learning curve. Lack of Google services might be a deal breaker for reliance on specific apps.

User 2: Budget-Conscious Student: The M52 5G offers excellent value with its robust features and mid-range price point. The higher cost of the Mate X3 may be prohibitive.

User 3: Senior Citizen: The M52 5G's familiar Android interface and simpler design might be more approachable. The Mate X3's folding mechanism and potentially limited accessibility features could present challenges.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices hinges on prioritizing innovation versus practicality. The Mate X3 represents a leap in design and interaction, but with a premium price and potential software limitations. The M52 5G offers a reliable, user-friendly experience at a more accessible cost.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G. While the Huawei Mate X3's foldable technology is undeniably innovative and exciting, my user-centered approach prioritizes accessibility and seamless integration for a wider audience. The M52 5G delivers a well-rounded experience with its excellent display, strong performance, and familiar Android ecosystem. It fulfills my mission of making technology understandable and enjoyable for everyone, without sacrificing essential functionality or affordability. The potential limitations of HarmonyOS and the significantly higher price of the Mate X3, coupled with its increased complexity, outweigh the benefits of its innovative form factor for my core user base. The M52 5G represents a powerful, user-friendly, and accessible choice that aligns perfectly with my technology philosophy.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.