Samsung Galaxy M35 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 222 g 198 g
Height 162.3 mm 164.2 mm
Width 78.6 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35ZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6The ZTE Blade is slightly taller and thinner, but the differences are minimal.
Weight (g)222198The ZTE Blade is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe Samsung's AMOLED display offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. The 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to the 90Hz on the ZTE.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612The Samsung has a much sharper display with significantly higher pixel density (390 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Size (inches)6.66.6Both phones have the same screen size.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare peak brightness without data. This impacts outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Exynos 1380 is built on a more advanced manufacturing process, leading to significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc T606.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Samsung's CPU has faster cores, resulting in significantly better performance for demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57 MP1The Samsung's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB6GBThe Samsung offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones have the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30fps (EIS), etc.1080p@30fpsThe Samsung offers superior video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage. More details on photo capabilities are needed for a complete comparison.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)60005000The Samsung has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 13The Samsung comes with a newer version of Android, offering potential access to newer features and security updates.
NFCYesYesBoth phones support NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset and superior GPU offer a much smoother and faster user experience, especially for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling. The higher resolution ensures sharper visuals.
  • Larger battery: The 6000mAh battery likely translates to longer usage time.
  • Newer Android version: Android 14 may offer access to new features and longer-term software support.
  • More versatile video recording: Offers 4K recording and Electronic Image Stabilization.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range, making it more budget-friendly.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE Blade sacrifices performance, display quality, and battery life for a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M35: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, long battery life, and the latest features. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over top-tier performance and features. Suitable for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks, the Samsung is a better choice. For basic use, the ZTE might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Samsung offers a significant advantage in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Heavy multitasker: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Budget-conscious user with basic needs: ZTE Blade V60 Design
  • User who prioritizes a lightweight phone: ZTE Blade V60 Design (with consideration for performance trade-offs)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.