Samsung Galaxy M35 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 222 g 189 g
Height 162.3 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78.6 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmThe ZTE is slightly taller and narrower, but thinner overall. Differences are minimal and unlikely to significantly impact handling.
Weight222g189gThe ZTE is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without further information.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe Samsung's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. Its 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother, more responsive experience compared to the ZTE's 90Hz LCD.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612The Samsung has a significantly sharper display with higher pixel density (390 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Size6.6 inches6.6 inchesSame screen size.
Peak BrightnessNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare outdoor visibility without peak brightness data.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Samsung's Exynos 1380 is built on a more advanced 5nm process, offering significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the ZTE's 12nm Unisoc T606.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Samsung's CPU has faster cores and a more modern architecture, resulting in significantly improved performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57 MP1The Samsung's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GBThe Samsung's 8GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking and better performance with multiple apps open. 4GB on the ZTE may lead to more frequent app closures and slower performance when multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones offer the same storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5000 mAhThe Samsung offers a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life. Real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS1080p@30fpsThe Samsung offers superior video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and image stabilization (EIS) at higher frame rates. Specific camera sensor details are missing for a more detailed comparison.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 13The Samsung ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset, coupled with 8GB RAM, offers a vastly superior user experience for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and incredibly smooth scrolling and animations.
  • Larger battery: The 6000mAh battery potentially provides longer usage time.
  • Better video recording capabilities: 4K recording and EIS at higher frame rates offer improved video quality.
  • Newer Android version: Android 14 offers potential access to newer features and longer-term software updates.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower price: Expected given the "low price" range designation.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M35: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, long battery life, and future-proof software. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and a lightweight design. Suitable for light tasks like browsing, social media, and calling.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is a budget-friendly option, while the Samsung is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the Samsung is vastly superior. For basic usage, the ZTE might suffice.
  3. How important are display quality and performance? The Samsung excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user, gamer, content creator: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Budget-conscious user with basic needs: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • User prioritizing long battery life: Samsung Galaxy M35 (due to larger battery capacity, but real-world usage may vary)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.