Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 222 g 205 g
Height 162.3 mm 168.6 mm
Width 78.6 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Pink
  • Ocean Blue
  • Sandy Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 550 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M35 vs. Xiaomi Redmi 13: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35Xiaomi Redmi 13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3The Redmi 13 is taller and slightly thinner, but wider than the M35. M35 might feel slightly more compact in hand.
Weight (g)222205The Redmi 13 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedMaterial differences could impact durability and premium feel; information is lacking for both.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzThe M35's AMOLED offers richer blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode. Its 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to Redmi 13's 90Hz.
Size (inches)6.66.79The Redmi 13 has a slightly larger screen, providing more screen real estate for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2460Both offer similar sharpness due to nearly identical pixel density; Redmi 13 is slightly taller.
Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)550 (HBM)The M35's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)The Exynos 1380, built on a smaller 5nm process, is expected to offer significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the Helio G91 Ultra.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The M35's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds suggest superior performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G52 MC2The M35 has a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM8GB8GBBoth offer the same amount of RAM for multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@ various fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsThe M35 offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at various frame rates. Detailed camera specifications (megapixels, aperture) are missing for both phones.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)60005030The M35's larger battery capacity suggests significantly longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speed is a crucial factor affecting usability; this information is missing for both.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate and higher brightness. Provides a smoother, more vibrant, and easily viewable experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset (Exynos 1380) and GPU. Enables smoother gaming, faster multitasking, and better overall responsiveness.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger 6000mAh battery. Allows for extended usage without frequent charging.
  • Better Video Recording: 4K resolution and EIS. Enables higher quality video capture.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the "low price" range, offering potentially better value for budget-conscious users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M35: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, display quality, battery life, and video recording capabilities. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, media consumption, and content creation.

Xiaomi Redmi 13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone for everyday communication, web browsing, and light media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 13 is a more budget-friendly option.
  2. What are your primary use cases? The M35 excels in demanding tasks while the Redmi 13 is sufficient for basic usage.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display, performance, and battery life for M35; prioritize affordability and lightweight design for Redmi 13.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Samsung Galaxy M35 for its superior performance and display.
  • Heavy Social Media User: Samsung Galaxy M35 for its vibrant display and long battery life.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyer: Xiaomi Redmi 13 for its affordability and lightweight design.
  • User Primarily for Calls and Texting: Xiaomi Redmi 13 is sufficient for basic communication needs.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.