Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 222 g 171 g
Height 162.3 mm 161.9 mm
Width 78.6 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M35 vs. Motorola Moto G85: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the spec sheet. We'll explore their design philosophies, user experience impact, and how they fit into your daily life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35Motorola Moto G85User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, Vivid ColorsP-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Richer Color PaletteM35 offers vibrant visuals; G85 boasts a wider color range for more nuanced media consumption. User preference will dictate the winner.
Interaction FlowSide-mounted Fingerprint SensorUnder-display Fingerprint SensorG85 provides a more modern, seamless unlocking experience with its integrated fingerprint sensor.
AccessibilityOne UI (Android 14)My UX (Android 14)Both offer customizable Android experiences. Specific accessibility features within each OS version need further investigation.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, heavier (222g, 9.1mm thick)Slimmer, lighter (171g, 7.6mm thick)G85 provides a more comfortable one-handed usage experience due to its lighter and thinner profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a freelance photographer capturing a vibrant street festival.

  • M35 Story: The M35's bright Super AMOLED display allows you to review your shots even under direct sunlight, ensuring accurate color representation. Its robust 6000mAh battery keeps you shooting all day without worrying about power. However, the side-mounted fingerprint sensor might feel slightly less convenient when quickly accessing the camera.

  • G85 Story: The G85's slim profile slips easily into your pocket, allowing for effortless maneuverability through the crowd. Its under-display fingerprint sensor provides a sleek and intuitive way to unlock your phone and instantly capture fleeting moments. While the battery is smaller, the power-efficient Snapdragon processor helps extend its usage time.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Power User: The M35's larger battery and powerful Exynos processor provide ample resources for demanding tasks and extended usage.

  • For the Casual User: The G85's slim design, intuitive interface, and vibrant display offer a comfortable and enjoyable everyday experience.

  • For the Accessibility-Focused User: Both phones run Android 14, offering a range of accessibility features. However, a deeper dive into specific features available within each manufacturer's customized Android skin (One UI vs. My UX) is recommended.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: Choosing between these phones depends on your individual priorities. If battery life and processing power are paramount, the M35 is a strong contender. If you value a sleek, lightweight design and seamless user experience, the G85 might be a better fit.

Design-Driven Insights: While raw specifications are important, consider the holistic user experience. How does the phone feel in your hand? How intuitive is the interface? These factors significantly impact your daily interaction with the device.

Conclusion:

This analysis offers a user-centered perspective on the Samsung Galaxy M35 and Motorola Moto G85. By focusing on design, usability, and individual user needs, we aim to empower you to make informed decisions that align with your personal technology preferences. Remember, the "best" phone isn't defined by numbers alone, but by the experience it delivers.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.