Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Honor 200 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor 200
Honor 200
Honor

General

Launch Date May 24, 2024 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 116.09 cm³ 92.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.97 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 222 g 187 g
Height 162.3 mm 161.5 mm
Width 78.6 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Moonlight White
  • Coral Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1200 x 2664
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 90 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 436 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 137.74 mAh/in² 115.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.69 mAh/cm³ 56.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M35 vs. Honor 200: A Comparative Analysis

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with manufacturers constantly vying for your attention. Today, we'll dissect two promising contenders: the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Honor 200. By delving into their specifications and translating them into real-world implications, we'll empower you to choose the device that best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M35Honor 200Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm161.5 x 74.6 x 7.7 mmHonor 200 is slightly more compact and thinner, potentially offering better one-handed usability.
Weight222g187gHonor 200 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based; under-display offers a cleaner aesthetic, side-mounted might be more ergonomic.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Honor 200 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling thanks to high refresh rates.
Resolution1080x23401200x2664Honor 200 boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density (436 vs 390 PPI).
Peak BrightnessN/A4000 nitsHonor 200's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Both chipsets offer solid mid-range performance, but benchmarks will reveal specific strengths.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreDetailed performance comparison requires benchmarking, but both should handle daily tasks well.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Adreno 720Gaming performance likely favors the Adreno 720 in the Honor 200.
RAM8GB12GBHonor 200's larger RAM allows for smoother multitasking and more demanding applications.
Storage256GB256GB/512GBHonor 200 offers a 512GB option for users needing ample storage.
Battery Life
Capacity6000 mAh5200 mAhGalaxy M35's larger battery likely translates to longer endurance.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version, offering similar software features.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.

2. Key Insights

The Honor 200 shines with its superior display, boasting a higher resolution, peak brightness, and slightly larger screen size. Its slimmer and lighter design also enhances portability. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip and 12GB RAM configuration suggest a performance advantage, particularly in gaming.

The Samsung Galaxy M35 counters with a potentially longer-lasting 6000mAh battery. While its display specs are slightly less impressive on paper, Super AMOLED technology typically delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Honor 200: Ideal for users prioritizing a premium multimedia experience, demanding performance for gaming or multitasking, and a sleek, lightweight design.

Samsung Galaxy M35: Best suited for users who value all-day battery life, prioritize a vibrant display, and seek a reliable mid-range device without breaking the bank.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your primary use case? Heavy gaming and media consumption favor the Honor 200. Maximum battery life points to the Galaxy M35.

  2. What is your budget? Both are mid-range, but specific pricing will influence the final decision. The 512 GB Honor 200 will likely be more expensive.

  3. Which design elements matter most? Consider weight, in-display vs. side-mounted fingerprint scanner, and overall aesthetics.

By carefully considering these factors and reflecting on your personal priorities, you can confidently choose the smartphone that best aligns with your needs and lifestyle. Both the Samsung Galaxy M35 and Honor 200 offer compelling features in the mid-range segment, making either a solid choice depending on individual preferences.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.