Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 198 g 209 g
Height 165.4 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Galaxy A35, two seemingly similar phones with some crucial distinctions that significantly impact the user experience. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these differences really mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Samsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mmA35 is slightly wider but noticeably thinner and a tad heavier. M33 might feel bulkier in hand.
Weight198g209gA35 is slightly heavier, a difference you might notice during extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen real estate.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDHuge difference: A35's AMOLED delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Resolution1080x24081080x2340Negligible real-world difference in sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280Exynos 1380A35's newer chip offers a significant performance boost (around 22%) for smoother multitasking and gaming.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MP5A35 has a slightly more powerful GPU, potentially leading to better gaming performance.
RAM6GB/8GB6GB/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8 GN8Comparable main cameras, but A35's sensor details suggest potentially better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.213MP f/2.2A35 boasts a significantly better selfie camera with higher resolution.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISA35 benefits from Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable endurance.
Charging25W25WIdentical fast charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A35, despite being positioned lower in the lineup, emerges as the superior device due to its stunning AMOLED display, more powerful Exynos 1380 processor, and enhanced camera features, particularly the selfie camera and video stabilization. The M33 does offer a slightly lighter build, but this advantage is overshadowed by the A35's significant improvements in crucial areas.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities. Content consumers, mobile gamers, and social media enthusiasts will appreciate the A35's vibrant screen, smooth performance, and better camera system.

  • Galaxy M33: Might appeal to budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a slightly lighter phone. However, the compromises in display and performance are substantial.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What matters most to you? If display quality and performance are paramount, the A35 is the clear winner. If budget is extremely tight and a lighter phone is a must-have, the M33 might be considered.

  • What's your typical usage? For heavy multitasking, gaming, or media consumption, the A35's superior processor and AMOLED display are essential. For basic tasks like calling, texting, and light browsing, the M33 might suffice, but the A35 still offers a better overall experience.

  • How important is camera quality? The A35's improved selfie camera, wider-angle lens, and video stabilization make it the better choice for photography and videography enthusiasts.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 without hesitation. As a tech journalist, I value a high-quality display for reviewing content and a powerful processor for smooth multitasking. The A35's AMOLED screen is a game-changer, providing a significantly better visual experience. The performance boost and camera improvements are compelling additions. While the slightly higher weight is a minor trade-off, it's easily outweighed by the A35's advantages in key areas. The A35 offers a more future-proof and enjoyable overall user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.