Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 198 g 197 g
Height 165.4 mm 161 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Samsung Galaxy A25, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Samsung Galaxy A25Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mmA25 is slightly more compact and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable grip.
Weight198g197gNegligible weight difference; both phones are on the heavier side for modern smartphones.
Display
Size6.6"6.5"Minimal size difference; both offer ample screen real estate for media consumption.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDSignificant Advantage for A25: AMOLED delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency, especially with dark mode.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2340Virtually indistinguishable sharpness in daily use.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits (Unspecified)1000 nitsMajor Advantage for A25: Far superior outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280Exynos 1280Identical performance in terms of processing power.
GPUMali-G68Mali-G68Same graphics capabilities; expect similar gaming performance.
RAM6GB/8GB6GB/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking and smooth app switching.
Storage128GB128GB/256GBA25 offers a 256GB option for users needing more storage space.Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Comparable main camera specifications; image quality will likely depend on software processing.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.213MP f/2.2Advantage A25: Higher resolution selfie camera for sharper self-portraits.
Wide Angle5MP f/2.28MP f/2.2Advantage A25: Higher resolution wide-angle lens for capturing more detail in expansive shots.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISA25 benefits from Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable endurance.
Charging25W25WIdentical fast charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

The most significant differences lie in the display and camera departments. The A25's AMOLED display with 1000 nits brightness is a clear winner, offering a vastly superior viewing experience, especially outdoors. The A25 also boasts a better selfie camera and wide-angle lens. While performance is identical, the A25 having a newer version of Android and being a newer phone in general is also significant.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Galaxy A25: Best suited for users who prioritize display quality, camera performance, and a more modern, compact design. Ideal for content consumption, social media enthusiasts, and casual photographers.
  • Galaxy M33: A more budget-conscious option for users who prioritize core performance and battery life over display brilliance and camera enhancements.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the A25's AMOLED screen is a must-have.
  2. How important is camera performance? The A25 offers a noticeable advantage in selfie and wide-angle photography.
  3. What's your budget? The M33 might be a better value if price is a major concern.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A25. While the core performance is similar to the M33, the significantly improved display, enhanced camera capabilities, more compact form factor, as well as it being a more modern device (released almost a year after with a much more up-to-date Android version out of box) make it a more compelling overall package for my needs. The superior brightness alone would heavily sway me, as I often use my phone outdoors. The improved cameras are a welcome bonus. While the price difference might exist, the A25's advantages justify the investment for a more enjoyable and future-proof smartphone experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.