Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Oppo Reno12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 90.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.79 "/g
Weight 198 g 177 g
Height 165.4 mm 161.4 mm
Width 76.9 mm 74.1 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 90.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 55.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Oppo Reno12: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Oppo Reno12, going beyond the spec sheet to understand what these phones offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Oppo Reno12Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mmReno12 is noticeably more compact and almost 2mm thinner, making it more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight198g177gThe Reno12's lighter weight (21g difference) will be appreciated during extended use.
BuildPlasticGlassReno12's glass back offers a more premium feel and potentially better durability.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate; both offer immersive experiences.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDReno12's AMOLED display delivers significantly richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency, especially with dark mode.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
BrightnessN/A1400 nitsThe Reno12's superior brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, even in direct sunlight. M33's lack of data is a potential concern.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Reno12's Dimensity chip, built on a more advanced process, promises better performance and efficiency.
Antutu475,448702,140Reno12 boasts a significantly higher benchmark score, indicating smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
RAM6GB/8GB12GB/16GBReno12's larger RAM capacity allows for seamless multitasking and handling demanding applications without slowdown.
Storage128GB256GB/512GBReno12 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Comparable main cameras on paper; real-world performance will depend on image processing. Reno12's Sony sensor might have an edge.
Selfie8MP f/2.232MP f/2.0Reno12's higher resolution selfie camera will produce significantly more detailed self-portraits.
Charging25W80WReno12's dramatically faster charging will significantly reduce downtime.
Battery5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but Reno12's efficient chip might provide an advantage.

2. Key Insights

The Oppo Reno12 emerges as the clear winner in this comparison. It offers a more modern and powerful package with a superior display, significantly better performance, faster charging, and a more capable selfie camera. The Reno12's sleeker design and premium build materials further enhance its appeal. The Samsung Galaxy M33, while offering a 120Hz refresh rate and expandable storage, feels dated in comparison, especially in terms of performance and charging speed.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo Reno12: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, fast charging, a great selfie experience, and a premium design. This phone is well-suited for demanding tasks, gaming, content creation, and anyone who wants a phone that feels modern and up-to-date.

  • Samsung Galaxy M33: Might appeal to budget-conscious users who prioritize a smooth display and basic functionality. However, its older hardware and slower charging might feel limiting in the long run.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Reno12 will likely be more expensive.
  • What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Reno12 is the better choice.
  • How important is fast charging? The Reno12's 80W charging is a major advantage.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo Reno12. As a tech journalist, I value performance, a great display, and fast charging. The Reno12's superior processor, stunning AMOLED screen, and blazing-fast 80W charging are compelling. While the M33 offers a competitive price point, the Reno12's advantages in key areas make it a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use in the long run. The significantly improved camera, particularly the selfie camera, is also a major draw. The Reno12's overall package represents a significant leap forward in user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.