Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Nokia X30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Nokia

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 September 21, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 93.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 198 g 185 g
Height 165.4 mm 158.9 mm
Width 76.9 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Cloudy Blue
  • Ice White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 85 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 101.58 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 44.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Nokia X30: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Today, we're dissecting two mid-range contenders vying for your attention: the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Nokia X30. Let's cut through the marketing jargon and uncover what these phones truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia X30Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm, 198g158.9 x 73.9 x 8 mm, 185gNokia X30 is noticeably more compact and lighter, making it more pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use.
BuildPlastic Frame, Gorilla Glass 5Aluminum Frame, Gorilla Glass VictusThe X30 boasts a more premium build with enhanced durability thanks to the Victus glass and aluminum frame.
Display
Size6.6"6.43"M33 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDNokia X30's AMOLED display delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency, especially in dark mode.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzM33 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Benchmark results favor the Exynos 1280, but real-world performance differences might be subtle for everyday tasks.
RAM6GB/8GB6GB/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage128GB128GB/256GBThe X30 offers a 256GB option for users who need more storage space.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8Comparable main cameras likely deliver similar image quality in good lighting.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.4X30's higher resolution selfie camera should produce more detailed self-portraits.
Video4K@30fps1080p@60fpsM33 can record higher resolution video, but X30 offers smoother 60fps recording at 1080p. X30 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for steadier video footage.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhThe M33's significantly larger battery promises longer endurance.
Charging25W33WThe X30 supports faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy M33 prioritizes performance and battery life. Its larger display and higher refresh rate cater to media consumption and gaming. However, the TFT LCD panel falls short of the X30's AMOLED in terms of vibrancy and contrast.

The Nokia X30, on the other hand, excels in build quality, display technology, and overall refinement. The AMOLED screen, aluminum frame, and Gorilla Glass Victus offer a more premium experience. While its battery is smaller, the faster charging speeds help compensate. The inclusion of OIS for video recording is a significant advantage for capturing stable footage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

M33: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and a large screen on a budget. Gamers and heavy media consumers might find the M33 appealing.

X30: Suited for users who value a premium design, a vibrant display, and a compact form factor. Those who prioritize camera video stability and faster charging would lean towards the X30.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What matters most: raw performance or overall experience? If raw performance is paramount, the M33 edges out. If you desire a more refined and premium experience, the X30 is the better choice.
  • How important is battery life versus charging speed? The M33 lasts longer on a single charge, while the X30 charges faster.
  • What is your budget? The M33 typically comes at a lower price point, making it a value-oriented option.

My Choice: Personally, I'd choose the Nokia X30. The superior AMOLED display, more compact and premium build, along with the OIS for video recording are compelling factors. While the smaller battery is a slight drawback, the faster 33W charging mitigates this for me. I prioritize overall user experience and build quality, and the X30 delivers on those fronts. The slightly higher price would be a worthwhile investment for the enhanced experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.