Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Nokia G60 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G60
Nokia G60
Nokia

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 108.35 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 198 g 190 g
Height 165.4 mm 166 mm
Width 76.9 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Pure Black
  • Ice Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 82.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 103.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 41.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Nokia G60: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Choosing the right smartphone involves navigating a sea of specs and marketing jargon. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I'm here to cut through the noise and deliver a clear, user-focused comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Nokia G60.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Let's dissect the core specifications and their real-world impact:

Design and Build:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G60Real-World Implications
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm166 x 75.9 x 8.6 mmNokia G60 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight198g190gNokia G60's lighter weight reduces hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsPlasticPlastic (Recycled)Both have plastic bodies; Nokia emphasizes sustainability with recycled materials. Durability might be a concern for both.

Display:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G60Real-World Implications
Size6.6"6.58"Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2408Sharp and detailed visuals on both.
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDNokia G60's IPS LCD offers better color accuracy, wider viewing angles, and improved outdoor visibility compared to the M33's TFT.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both, enhancing the user experience.

Performance:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G60Real-World Implications
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Samsung boasts a slightly faster processor in benchmarks, but real-world performance differences might be negligible for average users. Snapdragon generally has better power efficiency.
RAM6GB/8GB4GB/6GBSamsung offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
Storage128GB64GB/128GBComparable storage options; choose based on your needs. Lack of expandable storage on both is limiting.

Camera:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G60Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Similar primary camera performance expected.
Video4K@30fps1080p@30fpsM33 offers 4K video recording for higher resolution content.
FeaturesQuad Camera, dedicated macro lensTriple Camera, Night ModeM33 provides a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots; Nokia emphasizes low-light photography with Night Mode.

Battery Life:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G60Real-World Implications
Capacity5000mAh4500mAhSamsung's larger battery likely translates to longer usage time between charges.
Charging25W20WFaster charging on the M33, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While benchmarks favor the M33, the Snapdragon 695 in the Nokia G60 is known for its efficiency and reliable performance. For everyday tasks, both should suffice. Power users might prefer the M33's extra RAM.
  • Display: The Nokia G60's IPS LCD panel delivers a superior visual experience compared to the M33's TFT.
  • Camera: It's a close call. The M33 offers 4K video and a dedicated macro lens, while the G60 counters with Night Mode for improved low-light shots.
  • Battery: The M33's larger battery and faster charging give it a clear advantage in terms of endurance and convenience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M33: Best for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and 4K video recording. Gamers and heavy multimedia consumers will appreciate the extra RAM and larger battery.
  • Nokia G60: Ideal for users who value a vibrant display, reliable performance, and a focus on sustainability. Those who capture a lot of photos in low-light conditions will benefit from Night Mode.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The Nokia G60 is typically more affordable.
  2. Is battery life a top priority? If so, the M33 is the clear winner.
  3. Do you frequently shoot videos or photos in low light? M33 for video enthusiasts; G60 for low-light photography.

My Choice: I would choose the Nokia G60. While the M33 boasts a slightly faster processor and a larger battery, the G60's superior display technology (IPS LCD vs. TFT), emphasis on sustainability (recycled materials), and generally lower price point make it a more compelling option for me. The slightly smaller battery is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the overall package, particularly the enhanced visual experience. I prioritize screen quality and value, and the G60 strikes a better balance in those areas for my personal needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.