Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Nokia G100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 October 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 113.73 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 198 g 195.1 g
Height 165.4 mm 166.6 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Nordic Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 43.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Nokia G100: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Let's cut through the marketing fluff and get down to brass tacks. We're pitting the Samsung Galaxy M33 against the Nokia G100, two phones vying for your attention in a crowded market. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, my goal is to give you the unvarnished truth, translating specs into real-world experiences so you can choose the phone that truly fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia G100Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mmM33 slightly thicker, G100 slightly taller. Negligible difference in hand.
Weight198g195.1gVirtually identical, won't feel a difference.
Build QualityGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 3M33 offers better screen scratch resistance.
Display
Size6.6"6.52"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080x2408720x1600M33 significantly sharper, crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzM33 noticeably smoother scrolling and animations.
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDG100 potentially better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 662 (11nm)M33 vastly more powerful, better for gaming and multitasking.
RAM6GB/8GB3GB/4GBM33 handles more apps simultaneously without slowdown.
Storage128GB32GB/128GBM33 base model offers more storage.
Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.813MP f/2.0M33 captures significantly more detail, better low light.
Video4K@30fps1080p@30fpsM33 offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life expected.
Charging25W15WM33 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights:

The Samsung Galaxy M33 demonstrably outperforms the Nokia G100 in key areas: performance, display, and camera. The Exynos 1280 chip in the M33 crushes the Snapdragon 662, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. The higher resolution and refresh rate display on the M33 provides a noticeably superior visual experience. Finally, the 50MP main camera on the M33 captures vastly more detail than the 13MP sensor on the G100.

The Nokia G100's potential advantages lie in its IPS LCD technology, which often boasts better color accuracy than TFT, and its potentially longer software support, a hallmark of Nokia devices. However, these are minor compared to the performance gap.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations:

  • Samsung Galaxy M33: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, a capable camera, and faster charging. Ideal for gamers, content creators, and multitaskers.

  • Nokia G100: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and potential software longevity over raw performance. Suitable for light users primarily focused on calling, texting, and web browsing.

4. Buying Decision Framework:

  1. What is your budget? The G100 is likely cheaper, making it a budget option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Heavy users will appreciate the M33's power.
  3. How important is camera quality? The M33's camera is a clear winner.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M33

If it were my money, I'd opt for the Samsung Galaxy M33. While the Nokia G100 offers a lower price point, the M33's significant advantages in performance, display, and camera make it a far more compelling device for my needs. I value a smooth, responsive user experience, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos. The faster charging is a welcome bonus. The performance difference alone is a game-changer, future-proofing the device for longer. While I appreciate the potential longevity of Nokia software, the performance limitations of the G100 would be a constant frustration.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.