Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 198 g 200 g
Height 165.4 mm 169.2 mm
Width 76.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.75 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Nokia C31: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone Buyer

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Today, we're dissecting two mid-range contenders vying for your attention: the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Nokia C31. Let's cut through the marketing fluff and see how these devices stack up in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Nokia C31Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm, 198g169.2 x 78 x 8.6 mm, 200gM33 slightly smaller, but both are similar in hand
Build QualityGorilla Glass 5UnknownM33 offers better screen protection from scratches
Display
Size6.6"6.75"C31 marginally larger screen
Resolution1080x2408720x1600M33 significantly sharper and more detailed visuals
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzM33 smoother scrolling and animations
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDC31 potentially better color accuracy and viewing angles, despite lower resolution
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28nm)M33 vastly superior processing power, smoother multitasking, and better gaming
RAM6GB/8GB4GBM33 handles demanding apps and multitasking with ease
Storage128GB64GB/128GBComparable storage options, but no expandable storage on either
Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.813MPM33 captures significantly more detail and better low-light photos
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.25MPM33 better selfie quality
Video4K@30fps1080p@30fpsM33 offers higher resolution video recording
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5050mAhNearly identical battery capacity, expecting similar longevity
Charging25W Fast Charging10WM33 charges significantly faster

2. Key Insights:

The Samsung Galaxy M33 is the clear performance champion. Its Exynos 1280 chipset, coupled with ample RAM and a 120Hz display, delivers a fluid and responsive user experience. The higher resolution display is a major plus for media consumption and gaming. However, using a TFT panel instead of an IPS LCD might lead to slightly washed-out colors compared to the Nokia C31.

The Nokia C31, while lagging in performance, offers a slightly larger display with potentially better color reproduction thanks to its IPS LCD technology. Its strength lies in its simplicity and potential for long battery life, though the slower 10W charging is a drawback.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations:

Galaxy M33: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth user interface, mobile gaming, and capturing high-quality photos and videos. Students, young professionals, and content creators would appreciate its capabilities.

Nokia C31: Suitable for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light social media. Its large display is good for reading and watching videos, but its limited performance isn't ideal for demanding applications. Senior citizens or those seeking a simple, reliable device might find it appealing.

4. Buying Decision Framework:

  • What is your budget? The Nokia C31 is generally more affordable.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the M33's performance; light users might find the C31 sufficient.
  • Which features matter most to you? Prioritize performance and camera? Choose the M33. Prioritize battery life and simplicity? The C31 might be a better fit.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who values performance and a fluid user experience, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M33. The superior processor, higher refresh rate display, and better camera system are significant advantages that outweigh the slightly smaller screen size and the TFT panel. While the Nokia C31 offers decent value for its price, the performance gap is too substantial for me to overlook. The M33's faster charging is also a major plus in my fast-paced life. While I appreciate Nokia's commitment to simplicity and durability, the M33 better suits my needs as a power user and content creator.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.