Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 198 g 188.4 g
Height 165.4 mm 171.3 mm
Width 76.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Motorola Razr 50, two phones targeting different niches with distinct strengths. My goal is to provide you with the knowledge to decide which device best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design
FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 50 offers compact portability when folded, expanding to a larger screen when needed. M33 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmRazr 50 is taller and slimmer when unfolded, but thicker when folded. M33 is wider. Pocket and hand feel will differ significantly.
Weight198g188.4gRazr 50 is slightly lighter, but the weight distribution when folded might feel unique.
Build Materials--(Missing data) Durability and premium feel are determined by materials; this information would be crucial.
Display
FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Size6.6"6.9"Razr 50's larger display offers more immersive media consumption and multitasking space.
Resolution1080x24081080x2640Razr 50 has a slightly sharper display due to the higher resolution.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Brightness0 nits3000 nitsThe Razr 50's dramatically higher brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. M33's 0 nits is likely an error in the data, but even a typical LCD will be significantly dimmer than 3000 nits.
TechnologyTFT LCD-(Missing data) Razr 50's display technology (likely OLED) will impact color accuracy, contrast, and power efficiency. This is a critical differentiator.
Performance
FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Dimensity 7300X (4nm)Razr 50's newer and more powerful chipset will likely deliver significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
Antutu475,448620,395Benchmarks confirm Razr 50's performance advantage. Expect faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr 50 offers a higher RAM configuration, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with memory-intensive apps.
Storage128GB256GB/512GBRazr 50 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Main Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Comparable main cameras on paper. Real-world image quality will depend on processing and sensor details (missing).
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.232MP f/2.4Razr 50's higher resolution selfie camera promises significantly more detailed self-portraits.
Wide-angle5MP f/2.213MP f/2.2Razr 50's wide-angle camera offers higher resolution for capturing broader scenes.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps with OISBoth can record 4K video, but Razr 50 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization for smoother footage.
Battery Life
FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhM33 boasts a larger battery, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Charging25W Wired30W Wired, 15W WirelessRazr 50 charges faster and offers the convenience of wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Foldable Future vs. Traditional Value: The Razr 50's defining feature is its foldable design, offering a unique blend of portability and a large screen. The M33 represents a more traditional smartphone experience with a focus on affordability.
  • Performance Powerhouse: The Razr 50 significantly outperforms the M33 thanks to its newer processor and ample RAM. This translates to a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks.
  • Camera Considerations: Both phones offer capable cameras, but the Razr 50 shines with its superior selfie and wide-angle capabilities. The lack of detailed sensor information makes a definitive image quality comparison challenging.
  • Battery Balancing Act: The M33's larger battery capacity suggests longer endurance, while the Razr 50 compensates with faster wired and wireless charging. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns and the efficiency of the Razr 50's likely OLED display.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M33: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and a large screen will find the M33 appealing. It's suitable for everyday tasks, media consumption, and casual gaming.
  • Motorola Razr 50: Tech enthusiasts, trendsetters, and those who value portability and a unique form factor will be drawn to the Razr 50. Its powerful performance, enhanced camera features, and foldable design come at a premium.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is a foldable design a priority? If yes, the Razr 50 is your only option.
  2. What's your budget? The M33 is likely more affordable, while the Razr 50 commands a higher price for its advanced features.
  3. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr 50's superior performance is crucial.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50

While the M33 offers solid value, the Motorola Razr 50 excites me as a tech journalist. The foldable form factor represents a significant innovation in mobile technology, offering a compelling blend of portability and a large screen experience. The performance gains from the Dimensity 7300X and the enhanced camera features solidify its position as a true flagship contender. While battery life might be a slight concern compared to the M33, the convenience of faster and wireless charging mitigates this for my usage. I appreciate being on the cutting edge of technology and am willing to pay a premium for the unique experience the Razr 50 offers.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.