Samsung Galaxy M33 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 8, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 119.56 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 198 g 184.5 g
Height 165.4 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.82 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M33 vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy M33 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, two phones catering to vastly different needs and desires. This isn't just a spec comparison; it's about understanding how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M33Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandard SlabFoldableRazr offers pocket portability and a unique "wow" factor, M33 is a traditional design.
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm170.8 x 74 x 7 mmRazr is taller and thinner when unfolded, significantly more compact when folded. M33 is wider and thicker overall.
Weight198g184.5gRazr is slightly lighter, but the weight difference might not be noticeable in daily use.
Display
Size6.6"6.9" (Main), 3.6" (Cover)Razr boasts a larger main display for immersive content and a functional cover screen for quick interactions.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2640 (Main), 1056 x 1066 (Cover)Razr's main display has a slightly higher resolution, resulting in sharper visuals.
Refresh Rate120Hz165Hz (Main), 144Hz (Cover)Razr provides noticeably smoother scrolling and animations, especially for gaming.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsRazr's dramatically higher brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility. M33's missing brightness data is concerning.
TechnologyTFT LCDpOLEDRazr utilizes a more vibrant and power-efficient pOLED display with deeper blacks and better color accuracy.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)Razr's flagship Snapdragon chip delivers significantly faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr offers more RAM, enabling seamless multitasking and handling demanding applications with ease.
Storage128GB256GB/512GBRazr provides significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (f/1.8)12MP (f/1.5)M33 boasts higher megapixels, but Razr's wider aperture potentially captures more light in low-light conditions. Real-world image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Selfie Camera8MP (f/2.2)32MP (f/2.45)Razr offers a much higher resolution selfie camera.
VersatilityQuad Camera (Wide, Ultrawide, Macro, Depth)Dual Camera (Wide, Ultrawide/Macro)M33 offers dedicated macro and depth sensors, while Razr combines ultrawide and macro functionalities. Razr leverages its foldable design for unique camera angles.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3800mAhM33's significantly larger battery likely provides longer usage time on a single charge.
Charging25W Wired33W Wired, 8W WirelessRazr supports faster wired charging and offers convenient wireless charging.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Razr 40 Ultra, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor and ample RAM, is a clear winner in performance. It's designed for demanding tasks, gaming, and seamless multitasking. The M33, while capable for everyday use, won't match the Razr's speed or fluidity.
  • Display Delight: The Razr's foldable pOLED display with a high refresh rate and exceptional brightness is a visual treat. The M33's TFT LCD, especially with missing brightness data, pales in comparison.
  • Foldable Future: The Razr's defining feature is its foldable design. It's compact, stylish, and offers unique functionalities. The M33 represents a traditional smartphone experience.
  • Battery Endurance vs. Convenience: The M33 likely offers longer battery life due to its larger capacity, appealing to users who prioritize all-day usage. The Razr prioritizes faster and wireless charging convenience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who value cutting-edge technology, a premium and compact design, top-tier performance, and are willing to pay a premium for a foldable device. This phone is for those who want the latest and greatest, prioritize portability, and appreciate a unique form factor.
  • Galaxy M33: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and require a reliable device for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication. It’s a practical choice for those seeking value for their money.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Razr 40 Ultra is a flagship foldable phone with a significantly higher price tag than the mid-range M33.
  • Do you prioritize performance and a premium design, or battery life and affordability? The Razr excels in the former, while the M33 shines in the latter.
  • Are you intrigued by foldable technology, or do you prefer a traditional smartphone experience? The Razr embodies innovation, while the M33 offers familiarity.

My Choice: As Alex Griffin, I'd choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. While the M33 offers excellent battery life, the Razr's cutting-edge technology, stunning foldable design, powerful performance, and vibrant display are too compelling to resist. The compact form factor is a huge plus for me, and I'm willing to adapt to the smaller battery capacity for the overall superior user experience. The Razr represents the future of mobile technology, and I'm eager to embrace it. Furthermore, the lack of brightness data for the M33 raises a red flag for me. It suggests a potential weakness in outdoor usability, a critical factor in my daily usage.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.