Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Samsung Galaxy M53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2021 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 99.02 cm³ 93.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.81 "/g
Weight 180 g 176 g
Height 159.3 mm 164.7 mm
Width 74 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.49 mAh/cm³ 53.28 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M32 and the Galaxy M53. We'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and figure out which phone is the better fit for you. I'm Alex Griffin, by the way, and I'm here to make sense of the tech so you can make the right choice.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison, focusing on what each spec actually means for you as a user:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M32Samsung Galaxy M53Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions159.3 × 74 × 8.4 mm, 180g164.7 × 77 × 7.4 mm, 176gM53 is larger and thinner; M32 is slightly thicker but more compact; Negligible weight difference.
Build QualityUnknown screen protectionUnknown screen protectionDurability is unclear for both; Screen protectors are recommended
Display
Size6.4"6.7"M53 offers a more immersive viewing experience; M32 is more pocket-friendly.
Resolution1080x24001080x2408Both are FHD+; Sharpness is nearly identical.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzM53 feels smoother during scrolling, gaming, and animations.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors and deep blacks on both; Great for media consumption.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsThis is an odd specification to have at 0 nits on both; Brightness is unclear for both
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)M53's Dimensity 900 is significantly more powerful; Faster app loading, better gaming, smoother multitasking.
AnTuTu Score204,000500,100M53 offers a much smoother experience overall; Clearly superior performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G68 MC4M53's GPU handles demanding games and graphics-intensive tasks much better.
RAM4/6/8 GB6/8 GBM53 starts at 6GB, better for multitasking; 8GB is ideal for heavy users.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8108MP, f/1.8M53 captures more detailed photos, especially in good lighting; Better for large prints/cropping.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2Sharper, more detailed selfies on the M53.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsM53 records higher-quality videos; Ideal for content creators.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Both are comparable
Portrait mode (depth)2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both are comparable
Macro lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both are comparable
Camera FeaturesMany standard features, no PDAF4K, PDAF, digital image stabilizationM53 has faster, more accurate focusing (PDAF), better stabilization, and higher-quality video.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhExpect similar battery life under comparable usage.
Charging25W fast charging (15W in box)25W fast charging (no charger in box)Charging speeds are similar; M32 includes a charger, M53 doesn't (environmental reasons, allegedly).
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBM53 offers more storage, crucial for photos, videos, and apps.
ExpandableNoNoLimited by internal storage; Cloud storage or offloading to a computer is necessary.
Other
SoftwareAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)M53 has a slightly newer starting point; Both will likely receive similar updates.
AudioBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersM53 provides a more immersive audio experience, great for music and videos.
ConnectivityBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.2M53 has slightly improved Bluetooth efficiency and range.
SensorsCompass, Gyroscope, Proximity, AccelerometerGyroscope, Proximity, Accelerometer, GeomagneticM32 includes Compass; M53 Geomagnetic; Comprehensive sensor suite suitable for advanced features and gaming

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy M32:
    • Strengths: More compact design, includes a charger in the box, includes a compass.
    • Competitive Advantages: Lower price point, readily available accessories.
    • Trade-offs: Significantly weaker performance, older software, less versatile camera system.
  • Samsung Galaxy M53:
    • Strengths: Significantly better performance, higher-resolution camera, larger and smoother display, better audio.
    • Competitive Advantages: More modern features, improved user experience.
    • Trade-offs: Larger size, no charger included, no expandable storage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M32:
    • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. Someone who prefers a smaller, more pocketable device.
    • Use Cases: Everyday communication, occasional photo snapping, basic app usage.
  • Samsung Galaxy M53:
    • Ideal User: Users who value performance, a better camera, and a more immersive multimedia experience. Content creators, gamers, and those who multitask frequently.
    • Use Cases: Gaming, video recording, photography, streaming, and demanding applications.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself these questions:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you value speed and responsiveness above all else, the M53 is the clear winner.
  2. What's your budget? If every dollar counts, the M32 is the more affordable option.
  3. Do you need a great camera or just a decent one? The M53's camera system is significantly more versatile and capable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget Gamer: Go for the M53; the performance difference is worth the extra cost.
  • Casual User on a Tight Budget: The M32 will suffice for basic tasks.
  • Photo Enthusiast: The M53's 108MP camera and 4K video recording make it a better choice.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd pick the Samsung Galaxy M53. Here's why:

While the M32 has its appeal with a lower price point and including the charger, the performance gap is just too significant to ignore. The Dimensity 900 in the M53 offers a much smoother, more responsive experience, especially when gaming or multitasking. Plus, the better camera and larger display are big wins for me. Having that 4K video is a huge plus, especially since I like to take lots of videos and photos when I'm out and about. I do value the fact that it doesn't have expandable storage, but 128/256GB is typically enough for me!

While I'd prefer it if Samsung included the charger, I can easily use one I already have or buy a third-party one without breaking the bank. In the long run, the M53 offers a much better overall user experience and is worth the investment.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.