Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2021 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 99.02 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 180 g 180 g
Height 159.3 mm 161.5 mm
Width 74 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.49 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M32 and the Oppo Reno12 Pro. I'll break down the specs, highlight the key differences, and help you figure out which one might be the better fit for your needs. Think of this as a conversation with a knowledgeable friend who can explain the tech in a way that makes sense.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at the core specifications, with an emphasis on what they mean for you in the real world:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M32Oppo Reno12 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions159.3 × 74 × 8.4 mm161.5 × 74.8 × 7.4 mmThe Oppo is slightly taller and thinner, making it feel more modern and sleek. The Samsung is a bit thicker.
Weight180g180gVirtually identical weight, so both feel similar in hand.
Display
Size6.4"6.7"The Oppo offers a more immersive experience with its larger screen.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Both are sharp enough for everyday use, but you might notice the slightly larger screen on the Oppo more.
PPI411394Both have similar pixel density, so screen clarity is comparable.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors and deep blacks on both.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzThe Oppo's smoother refresh rate makes scrolling and animations feel more fluid.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsThe Oppo is significantly brighter, making it much easier to see outdoors in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)The Oppo's newer chipset is considerably faster and more efficient, leading to smoother performance and better battery life.
AnTuTu Score204,000702,140The Oppo has drastically higher performance, so everything from launching apps to playing games will be much snappier.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G615 MC2The Oppo's GPU is more powerful, offering better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.850MP f/1.8, 1/2" Sony LYT-600, 0.70 µmWhile the Samsung has a higher megapixel count, the Oppo's larger sensor and newer tech likely deliver better image quality in most conditions.
Selfie Camera20MP f/2.250MP f/2.0, 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN5, 0.64 µmThe Oppo’s front camera offers higher resolution and a brighter aperture, resulting in clearer and brighter selfies.
Telephoto LensNone50MP f/2.0, 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN5, 0.64 µmThe Oppo has a dedicated telephoto lens for zoomed-in shots, a feature the Samsung lacks.
Wide Angle Lens8MP f/2.28MP f/2.2, 1/2.8" Sony IMX355, 1.14 µmBoth phones have similar wide-angle lenses.
Depth/Macro Lens2MP f/2.4NoneThe Samsung has dedicated depth and macro lenses, but their utility is often limited.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps with HDR, OIS, EISThe Oppo can shoot in 4K with stabilization, making it a much better choice for video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have the same battery capacity.
Charging25W Fast Charging80W Fast ChargingThe Oppo charges much faster, getting you back up and running in a fraction of the time.
Software
OSAndroid 11, up to 13Android 14, up to 17The Oppo ships with a newer version of Android and is likely to receive more updates.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6The Oppo supports faster and more reliable Wi-Fi.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.4 LEThe Oppo has a more modern Bluetooth version for better efficiency and features.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB256/512 GBThe Oppo offers significantly more storage, crucial for photos, videos, and apps.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.

2. Key Insights

  • Oppo Reno12 Pro Strengths:

    • Performance: The Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset is a massive upgrade, offering significantly smoother and faster performance.
    • Display: The 120Hz display and higher brightness make for a more enjoyable viewing experience, especially outdoors.
    • Camera: A more versatile camera system with a telephoto lens and 4K video recording capabilities.
    • Charging: The 80W fast charging is incredibly convenient, reducing downtime.
    • Software: Ships with a newer version of Android and is likely to receive more updates.
    • Storage: Much larger storage options.
  • Samsung Galaxy M32 Strengths:

    • Price: The M32 is likely more affordable, making it a budget-friendly option.
    • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: The M32 has a more advanced side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Trade-offs and Limitations:

    • The Samsung Galaxy M32 lags far behind in performance, camera capabilities, and display quality. It's an older device, and it shows. The lack of expandable storage on both devices could be a limitation for some users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M32:

    • Best suited for: Users on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use.
    • Use Cases: A secondary phone, or for users who don't demand high performance or advanced features.
  • Oppo Reno12 Pro:

    • Best suited for: Users who value performance, a great display, versatile camera capabilities, and fast charging.
    • Use Cases: Photography enthusiasts, gamers, heavy social media users, and anyone who wants a smooth and responsive experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How much does performance matter to you? If you want smooth multitasking and gaming, the Oppo is the clear winner.
  2. Do you take a lot of photos and videos? The Oppo's camera system is far more versatile and capable.
  3. What's your budget? If you're on a very tight budget, the M32 might be the only option, but the Oppo offers significantly more value for the money.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User: If you absolutely cannot spend more, the Samsung Galaxy M32 will work.
  • Photography Enthusiast: The Oppo Reno12 Pro is the better choice due to its more versatile camera system and 4K video capabilities.
  • Gamer: The Oppo Reno12 Pro's superior chipset and 120Hz display make it the better option for gaming.
  • Everyday User: The Oppo Reno12 Pro offers a better overall experience with its faster performance, brighter display, and faster charging.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would undoubtedly pick the Oppo Reno12 Pro. The difference in performance is just too significant to ignore. The superior chipset, the higher refresh rate display, the more versatile camera, and the faster charging all contribute to a much better user experience. While the Samsung Galaxy M32 might be tempting due to its lower price, the Oppo Reno12 Pro offers a much better value proposition in the long run. You're getting a phone that will feel faster, last longer, and take better photos and videos – and I value those things immensely in my daily life. Plus, that 80W charging? A game-changer.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.