Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 99.02 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 180 g 184.5 g
Height 159.3 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.49 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down the Samsung Galaxy M32 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. This isn't just about specs; it's about how these phones fit into your life. I'll focus on translating the technical jargon into practical, real-world implications.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed comparison, focusing on what the specs actually mean for you:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M32Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableMajor difference. Razr offers portability and unique form, M32 is conventional.
Dimensions159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mm170.8 x 74 x 7 mmRazr is taller and thinner unfolded. Size when folded isn't given, but that’s the key factor for portability.
Weight180g184.5gNegligible difference.
Display
Size6.4"6.9"Razr provides more screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Similar sharpness. The slight edge to Razr won't be noticeable.
Pixel Density411 PPI413 PPIVirtually identical.
TechnologyAMOLED(Assumed AMOLED, not specified)AMOLED offers vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Razr, being a premium device, most likely uses a similar or better AMOLED panel.
Refresh Rate90Hz165HzHuge difference. Razr offers significantly smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experiences.
Brightness0 nits (likely an error)1400 nitsMassive difference. Razr is much brighter, making it usable in direct sunlight. The 0 nits for M32 is almost certainly an error.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Night and day difference. Razr is a flagship-level performer. M32 is a budget-friendly phone. Expect significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming on the Razr.
AnTuTu Score204,0001,238,000Quantifies the above. The Razr is way faster.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 730Again, Razr provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera64MP (f/1.8)12MP (f/1.5)M32 has higher resolution, but the Razr has a wider aperture for better low-light performance. Image processing is also crucial, and the Razr likely has superior algorithms.
Selfie Camera20MP (f/2.2)32MP (f/2.45)Razr captures more detailed selfies, but the wider aperture on the M32 might help in low light.
Wide Angle Lens8MP13MP (Wide Angle + Macro)Both have ultrawide capabilities, the Razr also combines this lens for macro shots
Macro Lens2MPNo dedicated lensM32 has a dedicated macro lens, which are often low quality
Video1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISRazr offers much higher quality video recording with stabilization.
FeaturesQuad camera, Digital zoom, HDRDual camera, 4K Video, OIS, Night Vision, RAWRazr has significantly more advanced camera features.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3800mAhM32 should last longer on a single charge due to the larger battery and less power-hungry processor.
Charging25W Fast Charging30W Fast Charging, 8W WirelessRazr charges slightly faster (wired) and offers wireless charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 13 (upgradable to 16)Razr has a more modern OS and a longer update promise.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6ERazr has faster and more reliable Wi-Fi.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.3 LERazr has the latest Bluetooth standard for better efficiency.
SIMDual SIM (Nano)Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM)Razr supports eSIM, offering more flexibility.
Storage
Internal64GB/128GB256GB/512GBRazr offers significantly more storage.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr has more RAM for smoother multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD cards.
Audio
QualityBasicStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosRazr has a superior audio experience.
Security
FingerprintSide-mountedSide-mountedSimilar and functional.

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy M32: Strengths are its large battery, potentially decent AMOLED screen (though brightness is unknown) and price. However, it's significantly underpowered compared to modern phones and its camera capabilities are limited.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A flagship foldable with a cutting-edge display (high refresh rate, brightness), powerful processor, and excellent camera capabilities. The folding form factor is a major selling point. Downsides are the smaller battery (compared to M32) and the generally higher price associated with foldable devices.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M32: Best for users on a very tight budget who prioritize battery life and don't need high performance or advanced features. Think basic communication, media consumption, and simple tasks.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for tech enthusiasts, early adopters, and users who want a stylish, high-performing device with a unique form factor. Good for content creators, gamers, and anyone who values a premium mobile experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself these questions:

  1. What's my budget? The Razr will likely cost significantly more than the M32.
  2. How important is performance? If you play demanding games or multitask heavily, the Razr is the clear winner.
  3. Do I value portability and a unique design? The Razr's foldable form factor is a game-changer for some.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a budget: Samsung Galaxy M32 (if affordability is the absolute top priority)
  • Social media enthusiast: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (better camera, performance, and unique design)
  • Business professional: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (performance, multitasking, and premium features)

My Choice

Personally, I'd choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.

Here's why:

As a tech journalist and analyst, I need a device that can handle everything I throw at it – from intensive research and writing to capturing high-quality photos and videos. The Razr's superior performance, display, and camera capabilities are essential for my workflow. The foldable form factor is also a major plus. It offers a unique and stylish way to stay productive on the go. Even though the battery might be smaller than the M32, the benefits that I would get would make up for it. Yes, it's a premium device, but for someone who relies heavily on their smartphone, the investment is worth it.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.