Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Motorola Moto G73 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2021 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 99.02 cm³ 98.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 180 g 181 g
Height 159.3 mm 161.4 mm
Width 74 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.49 mAh/cm³ 50.57 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M32 and the Motorola Moto G73. As a tech journalist and smartphone analyst, I'm here to break down the specs and tell you what they really mean for your everyday use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the key specs, along with their real-world implications:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M32Motorola Moto G73Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions159.3 × 74 × 8.4 mm161.4 × 73.8 × 8.3 mmPractically identical in hand; Moto G73 is marginally taller, but not noticeably so.
Weight180g181gBoth feel lightweight enough for comfortable use.
Display
Size6.4"6.5"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Sharp and clear visuals on both.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDMajor difference: AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMoto G73's smoother scrolling and animations feel more fluid.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G80Dimensity 930Significant performance gap: Dimensity 930 handles multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps much better.
AnTuTu Score204,000497,466Moto G73 is significantly faster for any computationally intensive tasks.
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Higher megapixel count on the M32, but image processing and sensor quality also play crucial roles.
Selfie Camera20MP f/2.216MP f/2.4M32 captures more detailed selfies in good lighting.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@60fpsMoto G73 can record smoother video due to the higher frame rate.
FeaturesQuad camera, no 4kDual camera, 4KM32 has macro and depth lens. Moto G73 records in 4K.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer solid all-day battery life for moderate users.
Charging25W30WMoto G73 charges slightly faster, minimizing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (up to 13)Android 13Moto G73 ships with a newer OS and should receive updates for longer, plus cleaner software.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6Moto G73 is more future-proof with faster Wi-Fi speeds and better efficiency.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.3Moto G73 has a newer Bluetooth version for more efficient and reliable connections.
Storage64/128 GB128/256 GBMoto G73 offers more base storage and a higher max storage option.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
AudioBasicDolby Atmos, StereoMoto G73 offers a much better audio experience for music, videos, and gaming.

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy M32: The M32's main strength lies in its AMOLED display. It offers vibrant colors and deep blacks, which enhance the viewing experience, but that is where the advantages end.
  • Motorola Moto G73: This phone packs a punch in performance thanks to its Dimensity 930 chipset and is a newer model. The 120Hz display makes a huge difference in daily use, and the software is clean. It also delivers better audio and faster connectivity.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M32: Ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant screen for media consumption and are on a tight budget. It is suitable for basic tasks, social media, and occasional photos.
  • Motorola Moto G73: Perfect for power users, gamers, and anyone who values smooth performance, a clean software experience, and future-proof connectivity. It’s also great for media lovers who appreciate good audio quality.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How much do you value performance? If you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks and gaming, the Moto G73 is the clear winner. If you only use your phone for basic tasks, the M32 might suffice.
  2. Is display technology crucial for you? The AMOLED display on the M32 is gorgeous. If you watch a lot of videos or browse photos, it might sway your decision, but be aware of the cost in performance.
  3. How important is future-proofing? The Moto G73's newer OS, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.3 will keep it relevant for longer.

Final Recommendation

For most users, the Motorola Moto G73 is the better choice. The performance gains are significant, the software is cleaner, and it offers better connectivity and audio. The faster refresh rate on the display also makes a noticeable difference in daily use. While the Samsung Galaxy M32 has a slightly better screen, the performance of the G73, along with its newer software, makes it the better choice for the vast majority of users.

My Personal Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I'd definitely go with the Motorola Moto G73. As someone who uses their phone for everything from writing articles to editing photos and playing games, the superior performance of the Dimensity 930 chipset is a must-have. Plus, I value a clean software experience without bloatware, which Motorola delivers. The faster refresh rate and better audio are just icing on the cake. The lack of expandable storage is slightly annoying, but the 128GB base storage is sufficient.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.