Samsung Galaxy M15 vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 5, 2024 May 30, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 114.35 cm³ 100.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 217 g 190 g
Height 160.1 mm 162.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 9.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Caramel Latte
  • Scarlet Wave

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 142.01 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.47 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M15Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions160.1 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm162.6 x 74.8 x 8.3 mmThe Motorola is slightly taller and narrower but noticeably thinner. The Samsung might feel bulkier.
Weight217g190gThe Motorola is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based, but under-display is generally considered more modern.
StylusNoYesThe Motorola offers stylus functionality for note-taking, drawing, and precise interactions.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"The Motorola offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzP-OLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Motorola's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to the Samsung's 90Hz.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1200 nitsThe Motorola's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the Samsung prevents a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 generally offers better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced 4nm process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The Motorola's CPU features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores, leading to improved performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 710The Adreno 710 generally provides better graphics performance for gaming and other visually intensive applications.
RAM6GB8GBThe Motorola offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Storage128GB256GBThe Motorola offers double the storage, allowing users to store more photos, videos, and apps.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5000 mAhThe Samsung has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, real-world usage will depend on other factors like display brightness and usage patterns.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps (EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fpsThe Motorola offers significantly better video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and higher frame rates for smoother slow-motion footage. Lack of detailed camera specs limits further comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M15 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While not specified, Samsung's M series typically targets a more budget-conscious market.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate for more fluid visuals.
  • Better Performance: More powerful processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More RAM and Storage: Enhanced multitasking and ample space for files.
  • Superior Video Recording: 4K resolution and higher frame rates.
  • Stylus Included: Adds versatility for note-taking and drawing.
  • Brighter Display: Significantly better visibility outdoors.

Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola's smaller battery might result in shorter battery life despite a more efficient chipset.
  • The Samsung might be more affordable but compromises on performance and features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M15: Users on a tight budget prioritizing battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for casual users primarily focused on communication, web browsing, and light media consumption.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): Users who value performance, a smooth display, ample storage, and versatile camera features. Ideal for gamers, content creators, multitaskers, and those who appreciate the added functionality of a stylus.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Samsung is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Casual use vs. demanding tasks/gaming/content creation.
  3. How important are features like a stylus, high refresh rate display, and superior camera capabilities?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Samsung Galaxy M15
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) if within budget.
  • Power User, Content Creator, Gamer: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • Note-Taker, Artist: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) due to the integrated stylus.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.