Samsung Galaxy M15 vs Honor 200 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Honor 200
Honor 200
Honor

General

Launch Date April 5, 2024 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 114.35 cm³ 92.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 217 g 187 g
Height 160.1 mm 161.5 mm
Width 76.8 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 9.3 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue
  • Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Moonlight White
  • Coral Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1200 x 2664
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 90 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 436 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 142.01 mAh/in² 115.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.47 mAh/cm³ 56.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M15 vs. Honor 200: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M15Honor 200Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions160.1 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm161.5 x 74.6 x 7.7 mmHonor 200 is slightly taller, narrower, and significantly thinner. M15 might feel bulkier.
Weight217g187gHonor 200 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based, but under-display often perceived as more modern.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"Honor 200 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Honor 200's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Resolution1080 x 23401200 x 2664Honor 200 has a sharper display due to higher resolution and pixel density (436 vs 396 ppi).
Peak BrightnessNot specified4000 nitsHonor 200's significantly higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of data for M15 limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is generally more powerful and efficient due to its advanced 4nm process. Expect better performance in demanding tasks and games on the Honor 200.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz A715 & 4x2.4 GHz A715 & 3x1.8 GHz A510)Honor 200's CPU architecture, clock speeds, and newer cores suggest significantly better performance, particularly in multitasking and demanding applications.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 720Adreno 720 offers superior graphics performance compared to Mali-G57 MC2, resulting in smoother gaming and faster rendering.
RAM/Storage128GB/6GB256GB/12GB, 512GB/12GBHonor 200 offers significantly more RAM and storage options for better multitasking and ample space for apps and files.
Camera
Video1080p@30fps (EIS)4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@60fps (OIS, EIS)Honor 200 boasts superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution, higher frame rates, and Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5200 mAhDespite lower capacity, Honor 200's more efficient chipset might result in comparable battery life. Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M15 Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity might translate to longer usage time, though this depends on optimization and real-world usage.

Honor 200 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Superior chipset, CPU, and GPU offer a smoother and faster user experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: Sharper, smoother, and brighter display with a 120Hz refresh rate and HDR support.
  • Superior Camera Capabilities: 4K video recording, OIS, and higher frame rates.
  • More RAM and Storage: Provides ample space for apps, files, and smoother multitasking.
  • Sleeker and Lighter Design: More comfortable to hold and carry.

Trade-offs:

  • Honor 200: Smaller battery capacity despite a more efficient chipset. Real-world battery life needs further testing.
  • Samsung Galaxy M15: Less powerful hardware, lower resolution display, and limited camera features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M15:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing long battery life and basic smartphone functionality.
  • Use Cases: Casual web browsing, social media, light gaming, and calling.

Honor 200:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a powerful and feature-rich smartphone with a great display and camera for a mid-range price.
  • Use Cases: Demanding gaming, media consumption, multitasking, content creation, and photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range but expect the Honor 200 to be priced higher.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy gaming and media consumption favor the Honor 200. Basic usage with a focus on battery life might favor the M15.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality, performance, and camera? Choose the Honor 200. Prioritize battery life and affordability? The M15 might be suitable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a Budget: Samsung Galaxy M15 if battery life is paramount.
  • Mobile Gamer: Honor 200 for its superior performance and display.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Honor 200 for its advanced camera features.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.