Samsung Galaxy M13 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 192 g 189 g
Height 165.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M13 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M13ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Negligible difference in size and feel.
Weight (g)192189Both phones are lightweight and comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen size offers ample viewing space.
Resolution1080 x 2408720 x 1612Sharper, more detailed visuals on the M13. Noticeably lower resolution on the A75 impacts clarity.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCD, 90HzA75's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, but the lower resolution is a trade-off.
Density (PPI)400267Higher pixel density on the M13 translates to sharper text and images.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)M13 likely offers better overall performance and efficiency due to more advanced node process.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz)M13's consistent core speeds could provide a smoother experience in demanding tasks. A75 has a performance core advantage.
GPUMali-G52Mali-G57 MP1G57 architecture in A75 potentially offers better gaming performance but real-world tests are needed.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB4GB/8GBRAM options vary, impacting multitasking capabilities. More RAM generally leads to smoother performance.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 5MP + 2MP +2MP50MP + 0.3MPM13 offers a more versatile camera system with ultrawide and dedicated macro lenses.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front camera resolution on both devices.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity suggests similar potential battery life, though real-world usage will vary.
Charging15W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingA75 boasts faster charging speeds, reducing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The M13's higher resolution display significantly enhances clarity and sharpness, making it a winner for media consumption. However, the A75's 90Hz refresh rate provides a smoother user experience, particularly noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
  • Performance: While the A75 boasts a newer GPU architecture and a slightly faster CPU, the M13's more efficient chipset (8nm vs 12nm) might translate to better sustained performance and less heat generation.
  • Camera: The M13 provides greater versatility with its quad-camera setup, including an ultrawide and macro lens. The A75's secondary rear camera is practically useless at 0.3MP.
  • Battery & Charging: Both phones feature a large 5000mAh battery. The A75's faster 22.5W charging is a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M13: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality and overall performance. Suitable for media consumption, casual gaming, and everyday tasks.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who value smooth scrolling and faster charging. A good choice for those who prioritize basic functionality and responsiveness over high-resolution visuals.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the M13's sharper screen is the better choice.
  2. How important is fast charging? The A75 offers significantly quicker charging.
  3. What's your budget? The A75 generally comes at a lower price point.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy media consumer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 for its superior display.
  • Gamer on a budget: The ZTE Blade A75 4G might be a better option for its smoother refresh rate and lower price, but test gameplay before committing.
  • User who needs fast charging: The ZTE Blade A75 4G is the clear winner here.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M13

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers tempting features like a 90Hz display and faster charging, the significantly sharper and more detailed display of the Samsung Galaxy M13 is a deciding factor for me. As someone who consumes a lot of media and appreciates crisp visuals, the M13's superior screen quality outweighs the benefits of a slightly smoother refresh rate. Additionally, I believe the more mature Exynos processor offers a more reliable and consistent overall experience. While faster charging is convenient, I prioritize a consistently good user experience, which I believe the M13 delivers better.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.