Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 192 g 209 g
Height 165.4 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Galaxy A35, two mid-range contenders vying for your attention. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these numbers really mean for your daily life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M13Samsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 is slightly more compact. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)192209A35 is a bit heavier, but unlikely to be noticeable.
Display
TypePLS LCDSuper AMOLEDA35 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2340Virtually indistinguishable sharpness.
Refresh RateStandard120HzA35's 120Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable upgrade in everyday use.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)A35's 5nm chip offers significantly better performance, efficiency, and future-proofing.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core (2.4 GHz & 2.0 GHz)A35's faster and more modern CPU cores deliver a smoother, more responsive experience.
RAM4GB6GB/8GBA35's larger RAM enables better multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A35 comes with a newer OS, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth have high-resolution sensors. A35 utilizes a newer sensor and OIS for better image quality.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA35 can record significantly higher resolution video.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities. A35's more efficient chip likely translates to longer real-world use.
Fast Charging15W25WA35 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

The Galaxy A35 emerges as the clear winner in terms of performance, display, and overall feature set. Its modern processor, AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and improved camera system deliver a tangibly better user experience. The faster charging is a welcome bonus. The Galaxy M13, while offering a decent 50MP camera and large battery, feels dated in comparison. Its processor is significantly less powerful, and the PLS LCD screen lacks the vibrancy and responsiveness of the A35's AMOLED.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Galaxy M13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality – calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking.
  • Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who want a well-rounded smartphone experience with smooth performance, a vibrant display, a capable camera, and long battery life. Suitable for most users, including those who enjoy mobile gaming or demanding applications.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The M13 is significantly cheaper. If price is your primary concern, it might be a viable option.
  2. How important is performance and future-proofing? The A35's superior processor and newer OS ensure a smoother, more responsive experience for longer.
  3. Do you value display quality and smoothness? The A35's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate is a significant upgrade over the M13's LCD.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Galaxy A35. The difference in performance, display quality, and overall user experience is significant enough to justify the price difference for most users. The smoother 120Hz display, faster processor, and improved camera with OIS are features I value greatly. As a tech journalist, I appreciate having a device that can handle demanding tasks and keep up with the latest software updates. While the M13 offers decent value for its price, the A35 provides a more enjoyable and future-proof smartphone experience. The jump to a 5nm processor, coupled with the software updates guaranteed by Samsung for the A35, mean this phone will feel fresh and performant for years to come. That kind of longevity is crucial in today's rapidly evolving tech landscape.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.