Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Nokia G100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 October 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 113.73 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 192 g 195.1 g
Height 165.4 mm 166.6 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper
  • Nordic Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 43.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy M13 vs. Nokia G100: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Nokia G100, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M13Nokia G100Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9M13 slightly slimmer. Negligible difference in everyday handling.
Weight (g)192195.1Virtually identical; both feel substantial in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.52M13 marginally larger.
Resolution1080 x 2408720 x 1600Significant difference: M13 noticeably sharper and more detailed, especially for media consumption.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent color reproduction, but PLS LCD on M13 might offer slightly better viewing angles.
Density (PPI)400269Major Advantage for M13: Sharper text and images. G100's display might appear pixelated to some.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850Snapdragon 662Both are entry-level chipsets. Snapdragon 662 potentially offers slightly better performance in demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Comparable performance for everyday tasks.
RAM4GB3/4GB4GB RAM on M13 provides smoother multitasking. G100 offers a 3GB variant that might struggle with heavy usage.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 5MP + 2MP +2MP13MP + 5MP + 2MPM13 boasts higher megapixel count, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar resolution; quality will depend on software processing.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging15W Fast Charging10WAdvantage M13: Faster charging speeds.
Other
NFCYesNoM13 supports contactless payments and data transfer.
Price RangeMediumBudget-FriendlyG100 generally more affordable.

2. Key Insights

  • Display Quality: The M13's significantly higher resolution display is a standout feature, offering a much sharper and more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Performance: While both phones have entry-level processors, the Snapdragon 662 in the G100 might handle demanding tasks slightly better. The 4GB RAM in the M13 offers a smoother multitasking experience compared to the 3GB RAM variant of the G100.
  • Camera: The M13's 50MP main camera promises higher detail, but real-world performance will hinge on factors beyond megapixels. We need to consider image processing and sensor quality.
  • Value: The G100 shines in its affordability. If budget is a primary concern, the G100 offers decent core features at a lower price.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M13: Suited for users who prioritize a vibrant, sharp display for media consumption, casual gaming, and everyday tasks. The extra RAM is beneficial for smoother multitasking.
  • Nokia G100: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality – calling, texting, web browsing – and long battery life. It's a reliable option for those seeking a simple, affordable smartphone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What's your budget? If price is a major constraint, the G100 offers good value.
  • How important is display quality? The M13's superior display makes a noticeable difference for media consumption and overall user experience.
  • Do you need NFC? If contactless payments are essential, the M13 is the only option.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who appreciates a good display and smooth performance, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M13. The sharper display significantly enhances the user experience, and the extra RAM ensures smoother multitasking. While the G100 offers great value, the compromises on display quality and performance are significant for my daily usage. The inclusion of NFC for mobile payments further solidifies the M13 as my preferred choice. I'm willing to invest a bit more for the long-term benefits of a better screen and a more fluid user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.