Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2022 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 192 g 171 g
Height 165.4 mm 154.1 mm
Width 76.9 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M13Motorola Edge 50 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is noticeably more compact, potentially easier to handle and pocket.
Weight (g)192171Edge 50 Neo feels lighter in hand, reducing fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypePLS LCDLTPO P-OLEDEdge 50 Neo's OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency due to per-pixel illumination.
Size6.6"6.4"Slight size difference; M13 offers a larger canvas for media consumption, while Edge 50 Neo prioritizes one-handed usability.
Resolution1080 x 24081256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh RateStandard120HzEdge 50 Neo's 120Hz delivers smoother animations and scrolling, enhancing the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8nm)Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Edge 50 Neo's more advanced and power-efficient 4nm chipset should translate to significantly better performance and battery life.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 50 Neo's CPU architecture with higher clock speeds indicates a substantial performance advantage in demanding tasks and multitasking.
RAM4GB8/12GBEdge 50 Neo offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 5MP + 2MP + 2MP50MP + 13MP + 10MPBoth have capable primary sensors, but Edge 50 Neo benefits from a dedicated telephoto lens offering optical zoom.
Front Camera8MP32MPEdge 50 Neo's higher-resolution front camera promises significantly better selfie quality.
Battery Life
Capacity5000 mAh4310 mAhWhile M13 has a larger battery, Edge 50 Neo's more efficient processor and display could result in comparable or even better real-world battery life.
Fast Charging15W68WEdge 50 Neo's significantly faster charging dramatically reduces downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the clear winner in performance due to its superior processor, ample RAM, and faster storage. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for demanding tasks and multitasking.

  • Display: While the M13 has a slightly larger display, the Edge 50 Neo's OLED technology, higher resolution, and 120Hz refresh rate provide a more visually engaging and fluid experience.

  • Camera: Both phones feature a 50MP primary camera, but the Edge 50 Neo pulls ahead with its dedicated telephoto lens and superior front-facing camera. This makes it a better choice for photography enthusiasts.

  • Battery: This is a closer call. While the M13 has a larger battery capacity, the Edge 50 Neo's energy-efficient processor and OLED display could level the playing field in real-world usage. The Edge 50 Neo's significantly faster charging is a major advantage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy M13: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display for media consumption and basic tasks like browsing and social media.

  • Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Ideal for users who demand smooth performance, a vibrant display, fast charging, and a capable camera system. Gamers, multitaskers, and content creators would appreciate the Edge 50 Neo's capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The M13 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Edge 50 Neo is significantly better.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Edge 50 Neo offers a more versatile camera system.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Samsung Galaxy M13 offers a larger battery and a more budget-friendly price, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the superior device overall. Its modern processor, vibrant OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, and incredibly fast 68W charging make it a compelling package. The smoother performance, better display, and faster charging significantly enhance the daily user experience and outweigh the M13's advantages in battery size and price for my needs. I value a responsive and enjoyable user experience, and the Edge 50 Neo delivers on that front.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.