Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 30, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 120.74 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 212 g 209 g
Height 164 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.9 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.41 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M12Samsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.9 × 9.7 mm161.7 × 78 × 8.2 mmA35 is slightly shorter and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable. M12 is taller and thicker, with a larger overall volume.
Weight212g209gVirtually identical weight; negligible difference in hand feel.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Almost identical; a minor difference, barely noticeable in daily use.
Resolution720x16001080x2340A35 offers noticeably sharper and clearer visuals; better for reading text, viewing photos, and watching videos. M12's lower resolution may appear pixelated to some.
PPI270390A35 provides significantly sharper display, crucial for detailed image viewing and reading.
TechnologyPLS LCDAMOLEDA35 has richer colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast, leading to more vibrant and engaging visuals, superior for multimedia. M12's LCD is adequate, but not as visually appealing.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzA35 is slightly smoother scrolling and animations, making the interface feel more responsive. M12 is still smooth but less fluid than A35.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is identical; However, AMOLED has inherently better visibility in bright sunlight compared to LCD.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)A35 is significantly faster and more efficient, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. M12 can struggle with intensive tasks.
AnTuTu Score117,341578,500A35 demonstrates vastly superior performance, capable of running modern games and apps more smoothly.
GPUMali-G52Mali-G68 MP5A35’s GPU provides considerably better graphics performance, essential for gaming and graphics-intensive applications. M12 is limited to basic usage and light gaming.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/2.0, 1/2", Samsung S5KGM250MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96", Samsung GN8A35 should perform better in low light due to the larger sensor and wider aperture; expect better image quality, less noise, more detail.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2A35 produces higher resolution selfies, resulting in more detailed and clearer photos.
Wide-angle Camera5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2A35's wide-angle lens captures more detail, offering better flexibility for landscape photos.
Portrait Mode2MP, f/2.4N/AM12 has dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, A35 does not have one.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.45MP, f/2.4A35 should capture more detailed close-up shots compared to the M12.
Video Recording1080p@30fps, No EIS4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EISA35 offers higher-resolution video recording (4K) with electronic image stabilization. M12 limited to 1080p and doesn't have EIS, leading to potentially shaky video.
DXOMARKN/A104 (Mobile), 107 (Photo), 110 (Video)A35 has received a good score from DxOMark, indicating a good balance of photo and video performance. M12 was not tested.
Camera FeaturesQuad camera, PDAFTriple camera, OIS, Ultra stable video, NPU AI Engine, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDRA35's OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes for sharper photos and less shaky videos; NPU AI Engine for AI-enhanced image processing. M12 has basic features.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should offer comparable battery life, suitable for a full day of moderate usage.
Charging15W fast charging25W fast chargingA35 charges much faster, reducing downtime and getting back to full charge more quickly.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 14A35 provides a newer user experience and more up-to-date features with a more secure operating system. A35 will receive more software updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axA35 supports WiFi 6 for faster and more reliable connections on compatible networks. M12 uses older WiFi standards.
Bluetooth5.05.3A35 provides a more stable connection with lower latency and potentially better audio quality on supported devices.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoA35 has more satellite connectivity, for better accuracy in location tracking.
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Both support dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal Storage32/64/128GB128/256 GBA35 provides much larger storage capacities for apps, photos, and videos.
RAM3/4/6GB6/8GBA35 is better equipped for multitasking and running RAM-intensive applications.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage via microSD.
Audio
QualityBasicDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersA35 provides superior audio with stereo speakers and spatial audio technology for a better multimedia experience. M12 has basic sound.
Security
Fingerprint Sensorside-mountedbasicBoth have fingerprint sensors; M12’s side mounted is considered faster and more reliable.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusA35 provides significantly better scratch and impact resistance. M12 lacks this.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeFingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic, Ultrasonic proximity virtualA35 offers a wider range of sensors suitable for advanced features and better gaming experience.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution and refresh rate provides a significantly better viewing experience.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset offers drastically better performance, smoother multitasking, and gaming capabilities.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Larger sensor, wider aperture, OIS, and 4K video recording make it a better choice for photography and videography.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging gets the phone to a full charge quicker.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 is more up-to-date and secure, with additional future updates.
  • Better Audio: Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos, and Hi-Res Audio for an enhanced experience.
  • More Storage/RAM: Options for 128/256GB storage and 6/8GB RAM is crucial for modern usage.
  • Premium Build: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus protection for added durability.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 for better connectivity.

Practical Implications: The A35 offers a much more premium and modern user experience. Its superior display, performance, and camera make it suitable for users who want a high-quality smartphone.

Samsung Galaxy M12 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: The M12 is a budget-friendly option, better for price-conscious users.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: While this is a very minor advantage, side mounted sensors can feel faster and more natural to some users.
  • Dedicated Portrait Mode Camera: Offers a dedicated sensor for portrait mode photos, however the quality is much lower than the A35's main camera with software portrait mode.

Practical Implications: The M12 provides basic smartphone functionality at a lower price point. It may be suitable for users with less demanding requirements.

Trade-offs:

  • A35: More expensive than the M12, no expandable storage and lacks a dedicated depth camera.
  • M12: Significantly inferior display, performance, and camera, lacks modern features, no expandable storage.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A35:

  • Ideal User: Tech enthusiasts, social media users, photography and videography hobbyists, gamers, and users who value performance and media consumption.
  • Use Cases:
    • Capturing high-quality photos and videos for social media.
    • Gaming on a smartphone.
    • Streaming videos and movies with great visual quality.
    • Running demanding applications.
    • Multitasking between several apps without lag.
  • Price-to-Value: A good value for those willing to pay more for premium features and performance.

Samsung Galaxy M12:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who need a basic smartphone for communication, browsing, and light media use.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic web browsing and social media use.
    • Making phone calls and texting.
    • Occasional photography or video.
    • Light gaming.
  • Price-to-Value: A budget-friendly device that gets the basics right, suitable for first-time smartphone buyers or older adults.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my budget? The M12 is significantly cheaper, so price is a big factor.
  2. How important is display quality, camera, and performance? If these are crucial, the A35 is the better choice.
  3. What kind of usage do I anticipate? Basic tasks only versus heavy media consumption and gaming?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is the Primary Concern

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy M12. The M12 offers basic functionality at a lower price point.
  • Scenario 2: Need a Great Media Consumption Device

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A35. The A35's superior AMOLED display and better audio make it better for watching movies and streaming videos.
  • Scenario 3: Demanding User with Gaming/Productivity Needs

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A35. The A35's faster processor, better graphics, and higher RAM handle demanding tasks much more smoothly.
  • Scenario 4: Casual User Who Wants a Good All-Around Phone

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A35. It is a much better option overall, with great performance, a great display, and very useful camera features, while being suitable for both casual and intensive tasks.

My Choice and Why

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the M12 is a lower-cost option, its limitations in display, performance, and camera make it unsuitable for my needs. The A35 offers a vastly superior experience in almost every aspect.

The A35's AMOLED display with its high refresh rate makes for a much more enjoyable viewing experience, whether I'm browsing the web, watching videos, or playing games. The significantly faster chipset ensures that the phone is responsive and handles any application I throw at it. Additionally, the improved camera system, with OIS and 4K video recording, means I can capture higher-quality photos and videos, which is important to me. Finally, the A35's advanced connectivity, including WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, ensures a more seamless user experience.

While the A35 is more expensive, the superior user experience it provides makes the additional cost worthwhile for me. In short, it will be a smoother and more enjoyable experience to use compared to the M12, and will likely last longer.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.