Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Oppo A54s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date April 30, 2021 November 18, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 120.74 cm³ 104.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 212 g 190 g
Height 164 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.52 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.41 mAh/cm³ 48.07 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G52 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy M12Oppo A54sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164 × 75.9 × 9.7 mm163.8 × 75.6 × 8.4 mmOppo A54s is slightly thinner and more pocketable.
Weight212g190gOppo A54s is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.52"Virtually identical screen size; negligible difference.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both offer similar sharpness, suitable for basic usage but not ideal for high-resolution content.
PPI270269Very similar pixel density; sharpness will be almost identical.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDIPS LCD generally offers slightly better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS LCD.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzSamsung Galaxy M12 provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing visual experience.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)Exynos 850 is manufactured on a more efficient 8nm process than the Helio G35 (12 nm).
AnTuTu Score117,341110,490Samsung Galaxy M12 offers a slightly snappier overall experience and potentially faster app loading.
GPUMali-G52PowerVR GE8320Samsung Galaxy M12's GPU has a slight performance edge for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution48MP50MPOppo A54s has slightly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail in good lighting.
Main Camera Aperturef/2.0f/2.2Samsung Galaxy M12's wider aperture could perform slightly better in low-light conditions.
Front Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.0Oppo A54s' wider aperture on the front camera may capture slightly more light in selfies.
Wide Angle LensYes (5MP)NoSamsung Galaxy M12 offers more versatile photography with a wider field of view.
Portrait ModeYes (2MP)NoSamsung Galaxy M12 offers a dedicated lens for depth effects, creating background blur in portrait shots.
Macro LensYes (2MP)Yes (2MP)Similar macro lens performance; both phones can capture close-up shots.
Black & White LensNoYes (2MP)Oppo A54s has a dedicated black and white sensor for potentially better monochrome shots.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer standard video recording suitable for casual use.
Video Slow-motionNoYes, 90fpsOppo A54s provides slow-motion capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth should offer similar all-day battery life for most users.
Charging15W Fast ChargingStandard ChargingSamsung Galaxy M12 recharges quicker with 15W fast charging.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removableOppo A54s can function as a power bank to charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 11Both run Android 11, so the user interface will be based on the manufacturers customizations.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/acOppo A54s supports the newer 802.11ac standard, offering faster and more stable Wi-Fi on compatible networks.
Bluetooth5.05.0 LEOppo A54s supports LE, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC for enhanced audio quality on compatible devices.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo A54s offers more accurate location tracking with support for additional satellite systems.
Storage
Internal Storage32GB/64GB/128GB64GB/128GBBoth have a maximum of 128GB of storage.
RAM3GB/4GB/6GB4GBSamsung Galaxy M12 offers more RAM options which could provide better multitasking performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has a slot for microSD cards.
Security
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedSide-mountedBoth have similar fingerprint readers for secure unlocking.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Gyroscope, ProximityAccelerometer, Magnetometer, ProximitySamsung Galaxy M12 includes a gyroscope for more accurate motion tracking, while the Oppo includes a magnetometer for direction sensing.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy M12 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid visual experience than the Oppo A54s' 60Hz display.
  • Slightly Better Performance: The Exynos 850 chipset offers a slight edge in overall performance compared to the Helio G35, according to benchmarks.
  • Versatile Camera System: Inclusion of a dedicated wide-angle lens and a portrait mode lens provides more shooting options.
  • Faster Charging: 15W fast charging reduces the amount of time it takes to recharge the battery.
  • Gyroscope Sensor: Samsung Galaxy M12 features gyroscope for better motion tracking in games or VR.
  • Multiple RAM Options: The option of 6GB of RAM allows for better multitasking and app performance.

Practical Implications: The Samsung Galaxy M12 is better suited for users who prioritize a smoother display, slightly better performance in day-to-day use, and more versatile camera options and quicker charging.

Oppo A54s Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable to hold for long periods.
  • Potentially Better Display: IPS LCD technology may offer slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles.
  • Better Audio via Bluetooth: Oppo A54s supports higher quality audio codecs for bluetooth devices.
  • Better GPS: Support for additional satellite systems may be better in areas with poor signal.
  • Reverse Charging: Ability to charge other devices, useful in emergencies.
  • Slow Motion Video: Oppo A54s offers slow motion video recording.
  • Black and White Lens: A dedicated black and white sensor provides an alternative to standard image color capture.
  • Magnetometer: Useful for direction and mapping apps.

Practical Implications: The Oppo A54s is a good option for users that prefer a lighter design, are more concerned about better audio quality and location tracking. Additionally, the A54s may be useful for those that would use the reverse charging function.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy M12: Heavier and bulkier, basic audio features, lacks some GPS capabilities, no slow-motion video.
  • Oppo A54s: 60Hz display, slightly lower benchmark performance, standard camera array with no wide-angle and portrait lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy M12 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who want smooth display and good daily performance.
  • Social media users who appreciate the wider field of view of the wide-angle camera for group shots.
  • Users who want faster charging: 15W fast charging is a great quality of life feature.
  • Casual Gamers: Gyroscope sensor gives more accurate movement controls in games.

Use Cases:

  • Daily social media browsing and content consumption.
  • Casual gaming
  • Photography of people and landscapes.
  • Quick daily battery top-ups.

Oppo A54s Ideal User:

  • Users who value a lightweight and comfortable phone.
  • Users who value audio: Support for higher quality codecs is a welcome addition.
  • Users who require accurate GPS.
  • Users who value the ability to charge other devices.

Use Cases:

  • Users that spend long periods of time on the phone and want it to be as light as possible.
  • Those who rely on accurate navigation apps and GPS.
  • Users that want better slow-motion video capture capabilities.
  • Users that have multiple devices and need to charge them on the go.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness to you? (90Hz vs 60Hz)
  2. Do you prioritize camera versatility or specific features (e.g., wide-angle lens vs reverse charging)?
  3. Is weight and ergonomics a major factor for you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget gaming and social media: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 for smoother display and slightly better performance.
  • Scenario 2: Lightweight design and better audio: Choose the Oppo A54s for its lighter build and higher quality audio capabilities.
  • Scenario 3: Location tracking and reverse charging: Choose Oppo A54s for its better GPS and reverse charging features.
  • Scenario 4: Basic Use and Camera Focus: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M12 for the additional camera lens and fast charging.

My Choice

If I were choosing between the two, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy M12. While the Oppo A54s has some appealing features like reverse charging and a lighter design, the smoother 90Hz display, faster charging, and more versatile camera system of the M12 is more useful for my typical use case. The slightly better performance in benchmarks also indicates a snappier general experience. I value the additional Wide Angle lens and dedicated depth sensor. Additionally, the extra option of 6GB of RAM provides more headroom for multitasking. The slightly heavier design is an acceptable trade-off for the overall better daily performance and features the M12 offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.