1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164 × 75.9 × 9.7 mm | 166 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm | Nokia G60 is slightly taller but noticeably thinner, potentially feeling sleeker in hand. M12 is thicker and bulkier. |
| Weight | 212g | 190g | Nokia G60 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Build | Unknown screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Nokia G60's screen is more resistant to scratches and minor impacts, potentially increasing the phone's lifespan. |
| ### Display |
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.58" | Virtually identical screen sizes; negligible difference in practice. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2408 | Nokia G60's screen is significantly sharper, resulting in clearer text, images, and videos. M12's display may look pixelated at times. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 270 | 401 | Nokia G60's display is much sharper with higher detail. |
| Technology | PLS LCD | IPS LCD | Nokia G60's display should have better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to the M12's display. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Nokia G60's screen will appear smoother during scrolling and animations, although the difference may not be significant. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have similar brightness; outdoor visibility in bright sunlight is unknown. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Nokia G60's processor is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 117,341 | 410,072 | Nokia G60 offers significantly higher performance; noticeably faster general performance and smoother gaming experience |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Adreno 619 | Nokia G60's GPU is much faster for graphics-intensive tasks, offering better gaming. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Main Camera Resolution | 48MP, f/2.0 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Nokia G60 has slightly higher resolution and a brighter aperture, which may perform better in low light conditions. |
| Selfie Camera | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.0 | Nokia G60's front camera has a wider aperture, which could improve low-light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 5MP, f/2.2 | 5MP, f/2.0 | Nokia G60 has slightly brighter wide-angle lens, which may improve low-light capture. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | Not present | M12 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots; Nokia G60 lacks this feature. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps; 4K Video (unspecified frame rate) | Nokia G60 offers 4K video recording for higher detail, and also has slow motion. |
| Video Stabilization | No | Digital image stabilization | Nokia G60 offers smoother videos with stabilization, reducing camera shake |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 4500mAh | Samsung Galaxy M12 likely has better battery life due to its higher capacity. |
| Charging | 15W | 20W | Nokia G60 charges faster, potentially saving time. |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Lithium | Minimal practical difference |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy M12 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers better potential for all-day use, especially for users who frequently use their phones for media consumption or gaming.
- Macro Lens: The inclusion of a dedicated macro lens offers creative options for close-up photography.
- Slightly better sensor configuration: Has Hall sensor not present in Nokia G60
- Lower price: The M12 is generally more affordable than the Nokia G60, making it a budget-friendly option.
Nokia G60 Advantages:
- Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 695 chipset provides much faster performance, leading to a smoother and more responsive user experience in general use and gaming.
- Higher Resolution Display: The 1080p screen is much sharper and clearer, offering a more enjoyable visual experience for media consumption and reading.
- Faster Refresh Rate: The 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, although not a major improvement, better than 90Hz
- Faster Charging: 20W charging is faster than 15W, reducing the time spent plugged in.
- 4K Video: Offers 4K video recording, providing higher detail in video footage.
- eSIM Support: Offers additional flexibility with carrier switching through eSIM functionality.
- Better Bluetooth version: Bluetooth 5.1 with better codec support offers better wireless audio experience
- Better Screen Protection: Uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for increased screen protection
- Better WiFi: Supports faster and newer wifi standards, better performance in crowded networks.
- More Satelite Navigation: Offers more navigation systems support for better accuracy
Trade-offs:
- Samsung Galaxy M12: Sacrifices display quality, processing power, and camera quality for better battery life and a lower price.
- Nokia G60: Has a smaller battery and is more expensive, but provides a superior user experience due to its performance, display and camera capabilities.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy M12:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life over performance and screen quality. Suitable for basic smartphone tasks, occasional social media, and light gaming.
- Use Cases:
- Users who spend long periods away from a charger.
- Individuals with a tight budget for a smartphone purchase.
- Users who primarily use their phones for messaging, browsing, and phone calls.
- Beginner smartphone users not requiring top-tier performance.
Nokia G60:
- Ideal User: Users who value performance, display quality, and camera capabilities more than battery capacity. Suitable for users who frequently use their phones for gaming, media consumption, and photography.
- Use Cases:
- Users who frequently play mobile games or use performance-demanding apps.
- Those who watch a lot of videos or consume media on their phones.
- Individuals who take photos and videos regularly.
- Users who prioritize faster charging and smooth performance.
- Those who prefer to have the latest technologies (faster wifi, bluetooth, navigation).
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- What is your budget? If your budget is tight and battery life is more important, the Samsung Galaxy M12 is the better option. If budget is not as much a concern, the Nokia G60 is the better choice for the extra features it offers.
- How important is performance and display quality to you? If you prioritize a smooth user experience, a sharp display, and enjoy demanding games, the Nokia G60 is the obvious choice. If you are using the phone mainly for basic tasks, the M12 is enough
- How important is battery life vs. features like camera, and screen? If you need the best battery life and don't mind the performance and display limitations, the Samsung M12 is better. If you prefer the extra features, like better camera, screen and general performance, Nokia G60 is the best choice.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget User: If budget is the most important consideration, and you prioritize battery life and basic functionality, the Samsung Galaxy M12 is the most suitable choice.
- Casual User: For users with moderate needs (social media, web browsing), the Samsung Galaxy M12 will be a suitable phone to use.
- Performance User: If you want a smoother overall experience, better gaming capabilities, faster loading times, and higher screen quality, the Nokia G60 is the more suitable option.
- Multimedia User: If you want better screen, good camera features, including better video recording, the Nokia G60 is the clear choice, while the Samsung M12 will be just ok.
What I Would Choose and Why
Given the choice, I would choose the Nokia G60. While I appreciate the larger battery of the Samsung Galaxy M12, the significant gains in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities of the Nokia G60 make it a superior device for my needs. The smoother user experience provided by the Snapdragon 695 and 120Hz display, along with the sharper screen and 4K video capability, outweigh the battery trade-off for my typical usage. I am comfortable sacrificing some battery capacity for a more responsive and higher quality overall experience. I value a better camera for casual photography. Also, the better screen protection and faster charging are welcome additions. While the Samsung Galaxy M12 is the budget-friendly choice, the Nokia G60 offers a better overall value for my needs, as I would benefit more from its increased performance and features.
