Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 181 g 188.5 g
Height 163.7 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Smartphones: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G

Let's embark on a journey to explore the distinct personalities of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G. We'll move beyond mere specs and delve into the narratives these devices tell through their design choices, ultimately aiming to understand how they enrich (or hinder) the human experience.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

Feature CategorySamsung Galaxy A73 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignRefined, One UI skin, focus on customizationMIUI, known for feature richness, bloatware potentialSamsung offers a potentially cleaner, more intuitive experience, while Xiaomi provides extensive customization options, potentially overwhelming.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to the powerful Snapdragon 778GCan feel sluggish due to the less powerful Snapdragon 685Samsung provides a more responsive and enjoyable user experience for demanding tasks and multitasking.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth devices offer similar baseline accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer and lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended useSlightly thicker and heavierSamsung might be preferable for users who prioritize comfort during prolonged use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a sunny afternoon at the beach. You want to capture the vibrant colors of the sunset and share them instantly with friends.

  • Samsung A73 5G: With its superior brightness (though the provided specs oddly list it as 0 nits, AMOLED screens are generally bright), the A73 5G ensures a clear view even under direct sunlight. The powerful Snapdragon 778G allows for quick photo editing and seamless social media sharing. Its Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) helps capture steady video of the waves crashing on the shore.
  • Redmi Note 13 4G: While boasting a brilliant 1800 nits display, making it a champion in sunlight readability, the Redmi Note 13 4G's less powerful processor might introduce slight delays when processing and sharing your masterpiece. The lack of OIS could result in shaky videos.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to a broad audience with standard Android accessibility features. However, the A73 5G's superior performance makes it a more inclusive choice for users who might rely on resource-intensive apps for communication or daily tasks. The Redmi Note 13's lower price point makes it more accessible financially, broadening its reach to budget-conscious consumers.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond the Numbers: While specifications tell part of the story, the true measure of a device lies in its ability to connect with the user. The A73 5G focuses on a refined, performance-driven experience, while the Redmi Note 13 4G prioritizes affordability and feature richness, potentially at the cost of some performance.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

As a technology communicator focused on user experience, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. Its superior performance, driven by the Snapdragon 778G, translates into a smoother, more responsive user experience. This fluidity is crucial for creating a truly enjoyable and frustration-free interaction. The slimmer design also contributes to a more comfortable user experience, particularly during extended use. While the Redmi Note 13 4G has its strengths, particularly its impressive screen brightness, the overall user experience offered by the A73 5G aligns better with my philosophy of prioritizing seamlessness, performance, and user-centered design. Finally, the A73's superior camera features, particularly OIS, make it a more versatile tool for capturing life's moments.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.