Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 June 17, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 119.52 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 181 g 204 g
Height 163.7 mm 169.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 82 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 133.26 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 50.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) JLQ JR510 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MC1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 11
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco C40: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand the nuances of these two devices beyond the raw specifications. Let's embark on a comparative journey, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GXiaomi Poco C40User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSleek, modern AMOLED with vibrant colors and smooth 120HzBasic IPS LCD with standard 60Hz refresh rateA73 offers a significantly more visually engaging and fluid experience. Scrolling, animations, and overall responsiveness will feel premium.
Interaction FlowSnappy performance due to powerful processorNoticeably slower due to less powerful chipsetA73 allows for seamless multitasking and app switching, while the C40 might experience lag, impacting productivity and enjoyment.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility optionsBoth offer basic accessibility features, but the A73's superior performance and display might make it easier for users with certain needs.
Design ErgonomicsLighter and thinner, more comfortable for extended useHeavier and thickerThe A73's lighter weight reduces hand fatigue during prolonged use, enhancing overall comfort and usability. The thinner profile makes it more pocketable.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast capturing a vibrant sunset. The A73's 108MP camera with optical image stabilization and 4K video recording allows for stunning detail and smooth footage. The C40's 13MP camera, while capable, lacks the same level of detail and advanced features. The A73's superior display then allows for vivid review and editing of the captured masterpiece, showcasing the true beauty of the moment.

Scenario: A busy professional needs to switch between multiple apps quickly. The A73's powerful processor handles this with ease, ensuring a fluid workflow. The C40's less powerful processor might struggle, leading to frustrating delays and interruptions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: A Senior Citizen: The A73's brighter, sharper AMOLED display and intuitive interface could be beneficial for users with visual impairments. The lighter weight is also crucial for comfortable handling.

User 2: A Young Professional: The A73's performance capabilities, high-quality camera, and sleek design cater to a user who values speed, aesthetics, and multimedia experiences. The C40 may suffice for basic communication and web browsing, but lacks the premium feel.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond the Specs: The A73 prioritizes a premium user experience through its design choices. It invests in a superior display, powerful performance, and advanced camera features. The C40 prioritizes affordability, sacrificing performance and features for a lower price point.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

While the Poco C40 offers a larger battery and a more budget-friendly price, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G resonates strongly with my user-centric approach. Its superior AMOLED display, coupled with the 120Hz refresh rate, creates a truly immersive and enjoyable visual experience. The powerful processor ensures smooth performance, crucial for a satisfying user experience. The significantly better camera system allows for capturing life's moments in stunning detail. While battery life is important, the overall responsiveness and quality of the user experience offered by the A73 outweigh the C40's larger battery capacity, especially given the A73's fast charging capabilities. Ultimately, the A73 provides a more holistic and engaging experience, aligning with my philosophy of prioritizing user experience over purely technical specifications. It feels like a device crafted with the user in mind, not just a collection of components.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.