Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 181 g 222 g
Height 163.7 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison, focusing on the user experience.

1. The Story of Size and Weight: Imagine holding each phone. The A73 5G, though slightly taller, feels noticeably lighter (181g vs 222g). The M35's extra weight might be noticeable during long calls or browsing sessions. For users prioritizing portability and comfort, the A73 5G tells a compelling story of effortless handling.

2. The Tale of the Display: Both phones boast vibrant AMOLED screens with smooth 120Hz refresh rates, creating a visually captivating experience whether you're scrolling through social media or watching videos. The A73 5G offers a marginally larger canvas (6.7" vs 6.6"), but the difference is negligible in everyday use.

3. Performance Narratives: Under the hood, different stories unfold. The A73 5G, powered by the Snapdragon 778G, and the M35, driven by the Exynos 1380, deliver comparable performance scores. While benchmark numbers are close, the real-world experience will depend on individual usage patterns and software optimization. For average users, both phones offer ample power for daily tasks.

4. Battery Life Chronicles: Here, the M35 takes center stage with its significantly larger 6000mAh battery, promising extended usage. Imagine a full day of work, travel, and entertainment without worrying about battery life. The A73 5G's 5000mAh battery is respectable, but the M35 offers a greater sense of freedom from the outlet.

5. Camera Adventures: The A73 5G boasts a 108MP main camera, capturing incredibly detailed photos. The M35, with its 50MP Sony sensor and advanced features like Ultra Stable video and AutoFraming, focuses on capturing steady and well-composed shots. Think of the A73 5G as your high-resolution storyteller and the M35 as your reliable cinematic companion.

6. Software and Connectivity Chronicles: The M35 ships with the latest Android 14, offering potential access to newer features and longer software support. The A73 5G runs on Android 12, potentially limiting its future software updates. In terms of connectivity, both phones offer robust options, but the M35's Bluetooth 5.3 provides a slight edge in terms of audio quality and connection stability.

User Experience Analysis Framework:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GSamsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
DesignSleek, LightweightSlightly bulkyA73 5G offers better one-handed usability and portability.
DisplayVibrant, SmoothVibrant, SmoothComparable visual experience, negligible size difference.
PerformanceSmoothSmoothSimilar performance for everyday tasks.
Battery LifeGoodExcellentM35 provides significantly longer usage time, reducing battery anxiety.
CameraHigh ResolutionFeature-RichA73 5G excels in detail, M35 in stability and advanced features.
SoftwareOlderNewerM35 offers a more up-to-date OS with potential for longer software updates.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M35

While both phones offer compelling features, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. Its superior battery life resonates deeply with my need for a device that can keep up with my dynamic lifestyle. The newer Android OS, coupled with advanced camera features and robust connectivity, creates a holistic user experience that prioritizes longevity, stability, and creative freedom. While the A73 5G offers a lighter design and higher resolution camera, the M35's advantages in crucial areas like battery and software make it the more compelling choice for me. It's the phone that tells the story of enduring performance and reliable companionship.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.