Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 181 g 209 g
Height 163.7 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and A35 as complete user experiences, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world usability.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSamsung One UISamsung One UIBoth offer a consistent software experience, but the A35 benefits from newer Android versions and potential UI/UX refinements.
Interaction FlowSmooth, 120Hz DisplaySmooth, 120Hz DisplayIdentical refresh rates ensure fluid interactions on both devices.
AccessibilityStandardStandardBoth likely include standard Android accessibility features, but specific implementations may differ and require further investigation.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (181g)Heavier (209g)The A73 5G's lighter weight significantly enhances comfort during extended use, reducing hand fatigue.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional using their phone throughout the day. The A73 5G's lighter weight becomes a crucial factor, making it easier to hold during long calls, commutes, and on-the-go multitasking. While both phones offer vibrant AMOLED displays and smooth 120Hz refresh rates, ensuring a visually engaging experience, the weight difference impacts overall comfort and usability.

Camera Narrative: A photography enthusiast would appreciate the A73 5G's higher resolution main camera (108MP vs. 50MP), potentially capturing more detail. However, the A35 boasts a higher DxOMark score, indicating superior overall camera performance in various scenarios, including low light and video recording. The A35's advanced features like "Ultra stable video" and "AutoFraming" suggest a more refined user experience for casual and professional content creators alike.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their user-friendly interfaces and powerful performance. However, users prioritizing comfortable one-handed use would favor the A73 5G's lighter design. The A35's newer Android OS and potential software optimizations could appeal to tech-savvy individuals who value the latest features and security updates.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices hinges on individual priorities.

  • Prioritize comfort and portability: A73 5G
  • Prioritize cutting-edge software and camera performance: A35

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the A73 5G offers a lighter build, the A35's superior camera performance, newer software (Android 14 with longer support), slightly larger screen, and comparable performance make it the more compelling choice for me. The advancements in camera technology, as evidenced by the DxOMark score and features like Ultra stable video, signify a more refined and enjoyable user experience for capturing everyday moments. The longer software support ensures that the device remains up-to-date with security patches and new features for an extended period, a crucial factor in today's rapidly evolving digital landscape. The negligible difference in screen size leans in favor of the A35. While I acknowledge the weight difference, the overall package offered by the A35 aligns better with my personal preferences for a device that excels in content creation, performance, and long-term usability.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.