Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 181 g 199 g
Height 163.7 mm 161.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A34: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the real-world experience of using the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the A34. My analysis prioritizes how design choices translate into daily usability for diverse users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GSamsung Galaxy A34User Experience Impact
Interface DesignFamiliar Samsung One UI, potentially more mature due to earlier releaseUpdated One UI, likely with fresher design elementsDepends on user preference for established vs. new interface paradigms
Interaction FlowSmooth 120Hz refresh rate on a slightly larger 6.7" displayEqually smooth 120Hz refresh rate on a slightly smaller 6.6" displayMinimal difference in perceived fluidity, A73 might offer a slightly more immersive viewing experience
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Samsung accessibility suiteStandard Samsung accessibility suite with potential improvements due to newer OSBoth offer a solid foundation, A34 might have subtle enhancements
Design ErgonomicsLighter (181g)Noticeably heavier (199g)A73 provides a more comfortable experience for extended use, reducing hand fatigue

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their phone for communication, productivity, and entertainment throughout the day.

  • A73 5G: The slightly larger screen and lighter weight become invaluable during long commutes and busy days, making multitasking and media consumption more enjoyable.
  • A34: The newer Android OS and potentially improved camera (based on DXOMark) might appeal to those who prioritize software updates and high-quality photography.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Users with smaller hands: The A73's lighter weight and narrower body might be preferable.
  • Photography enthusiasts: The A34's updated camera hardware and software, along with features like Night Mode, offer a compelling advantage.
  • Power users: While benchmark scores slightly favor the A73, both phones offer comparable performance for everyday tasks.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between the A73 5G and A34 hinges on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize comfort and portability: Choose the A73 5G for its lighter weight and slightly larger screen.
  • Prioritize newer software, camera features, and potentially longer software support: Choose the A34.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A34.

Reasoning: While the A73 5G offers a slightly more comfortable physical experience, the A34's newer Android OS (with longer update support), improved camera system (validated by the DXOMark score), and comparable performance make it a more future-proof choice. The design philosophy of constantly evolving and improving user experience through software resonates with my approach to technology analysis. The marginal weight difference is less significant to me than the benefits of a more current and capable device in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.