Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 181 g 189 g
Height 163.7 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Tale of Two Experiences

Hello, I'm Sophia Rodriguez, and today we're diving into the contrasting worlds of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. We'll move beyond the numbers and explore how these devices translate into distinct user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Smartphone LayoutFoldable with External DisplayRazr offers unique interactions with compact mode and external notifications.
Interaction FlowTraditional TouchscreenFolding/Unfolding + TouchscreenRazr introduces a tactile element, potentially impacting one-handed use and app flow.
AccessibilityStandard Android FeaturesPotentially Limited by SizeFoldable design might pose challenges for users with certain motor skill limitations.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, Potentially Less AgileCompact When FoldedRazr excels in pocketability, but A73 might offer better grip for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario 1: The Daily Commute: Imagine yourself on a crowded bus. The A73's larger screen provides a comfortable viewing experience for catching up on news, but its size can be cumbersome to manage. The Razr, neatly folded, slips easily into your pocket, then unfolds to reveal a full screen when needed. The Razr's external display allows for quick checks without unfolding, a win for tight spaces.

Scenario 2: Capturing Memories: Both phones boast impressive camera systems. The A73 offers a versatile quad-camera setup with a high-resolution main lens, perfect for capturing detailed landscapes. The Razr focuses on a dual-camera system with a larger sensor, emphasizing low-light performance and portrait photography. Imagine using the Razr's external display as a viewfinder for stunning selfies!

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: The Power User: A tech-savvy individual might appreciate the Razr's cutting-edge technology, faster processor, and higher refresh rate for a premium experience. However, the limited battery capacity might be a concern. The A73, with its robust battery, caters to extended use without frequent charging.

User 2: The Casual User: Someone prioritizing simplicity might find the A73's familiar interface more approachable. The Razr's folding mechanism, while innovative, adds a layer of complexity that might not appeal to everyone.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choose the A73 if:

  • Battery life is a top priority
  • You prefer a familiar smartphone experience
  • A larger screen for media consumption is essential

Choose the Razr if:

  • Innovation and cutting-edge design are paramount
  • Pocketability and compact form factor are crucial
  • You value the unique interactions offered by a foldable device

My Choice:

I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. While the A73 offers a solid user experience, the Razr's innovative design philosophy resonates with my approach to technology. The compact form factor, unique interactions afforded by the folding mechanism, and the powerful external display outweigh the trade-offs in battery life for me. I am drawn to devices that push the boundaries of user experience, and the Razr embodies this spirit. It's not just a phone; it's a statement piece that sparks conversation and reimagines how we interact with our mobile devices. The seamless integration of the external display into daily workflows, from quick replies to navigation, signifies a thoughtful approach to user-centered design. For me, the Razr represents the future of mobile technology, and I'm excited to be a part of that journey.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.