Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 181 g 188.6 g
Height 163.7 mm 170.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Motorola Razr 40: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these devices not just as lists of specs, but as tools that shape your daily life. Let's delve into the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the Motorola Razr 40, comparing them through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A73 5GMotorola Razr 40User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard SmartphoneFoldable SmartphoneThe Razr 40's compact folded size offers portability, but the A73 5G provides a larger, uninterrupted screen experience.
Interaction FlowTraditional TouchFoldable & TouchRazr 40 introduces unique interactions with its folding mechanism, potentially adding a layer of complexity but also novel functionalities.
AccessibilityStandardPotentially Reduced Due to SizeThe A73 5G's larger size may be more accessible for users with larger hands or visual impairments, while the Razr 40's external display might enhance quick interactions without unfolding.
ErgonomicsLarger, Single ScreenCompact when FoldedThe A73 5G prioritizes a consistent one-handed experience for media consumption, whereas the Razr 40 prioritizes pocketability and offers a dual-screen experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a travel vlogger. The A73 5G's larger battery capacity offers extended shooting time, capturing more of your adventures without worrying about finding a power outlet. Its superior camera setup, including wide-angle and macro lenses, allows you to capture breathtaking landscapes and intricate details.

On the other hand, the Razr 40's foldable design transforms into a compact tripod, enabling creative hands-free shots and unique perspectives. Its external display allows for quick selfies and vlogging updates on the go. While battery life might be a concern on longer trips, the innovative form factor opens up new creative possibilities.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For users prioritizing a simple, reliable smartphone experience with a long-lasting battery and a versatile camera system, the A73 5G shines. Its larger display benefits those who prefer a more traditional smartphone interaction.

The Razr 40 caters to users who value portability and a unique, stylish device. The foldable design and external display might appeal to those comfortable with a learning curve and who prioritize compact size over screen real estate. However, users with accessibility needs might find the smaller, foldable design less user-friendly.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these devices hinges on your personal priorities:

  • Prioritize Functionality and Simplicity: A73 5G
  • Prioritize Portability and Innovation: Razr 40

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

While the Razr 40's innovative design is intriguing, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G aligns better with my values of user-centered design and practical functionality. Its larger battery, superior camera versatility, and traditional form factor provide a reliable and accessible user experience for a wider range of individuals. I appreciate the focus on core features like battery life and camera quality, which are essential for everyday use and creative endeavors. The A73 5G feels like a device designed to empower users without sacrificing usability for the sake of novelty. While innovation is important, a seamless and intuitive user experience remains paramount for me.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.