Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 181 g 171 g
Height 163.7 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.1 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Smartphones: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Motorola Moto G85

Let's embark on a journey to explore the nuanced world of smartphones, where technical specifications translate into tangible user experiences. Our protagonists today are the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the Motorola Moto G85. Rather than getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll weave a narrative around their design philosophies and how they shape your daily interactions.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

Feature CategorySamsung Galaxy A73 5GMotorola Moto G85User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI, known for customizationNear-stock Android, minimalistSamsung offers more personalization; Motorola prioritizes clean interface, potentially faster updates.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to 120Hz displaySmooth, also with 120Hz displayBoth deliver fluid navigation and responsive experience.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibilityStandard Android accessibilityBoth provide basic accessibility features, but further investigation into specific needs is recommended.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly larger, potentially less comfortable for one-handed useSlightly smaller, potentially more comfortable for one-handed useMotorola might offer a more ergonomic experience for users who prefer one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a sunny afternoon at the park. You're trying to capture a video of your dog catching a frisbee.

  • A73 5G: The 4K video recording capability allows you to capture every detail in stunning clarity. However, the slightly larger size might make it a bit cumbersome to hold steady while chasing your furry friend.
  • G85: While limited to 1080p video, the G85's brighter display (1600 nits) ensures you can clearly see the screen even in direct sunlight, making framing the shot effortless. Its lighter weight contributes to a more comfortable recording experience.

Scenario: You're a mobile gamer.

  • A73 5G: The more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor and Adreno 642L GPU in the A73 5G provide a significant performance advantage for demanding games, ensuring smoother frame rates and faster loading times.
  • G85: The Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 and Adreno 619 in the G85, while capable, might not handle high-end games as smoothly. However, its larger RAM capacity (up to 12GB) enables efficient multitasking, allowing you to quickly switch between games and other apps without significant slowdowns.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both devices cater to a broad audience with their standard Android features. However, individual preferences will play a crucial role. Users who prioritize single-hand usability and outdoor visibility might lean towards the G85. Those seeking raw performance and customization options might prefer the A73.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

The choice boils down to your personal priorities. If vibrant visuals and a customizable experience are paramount, the A73 5G is your companion. If a clean interface, brighter display, and a more manageable form factor resonate with you, the G85 is a compelling alternative.

My Choice: The Motorola Moto G85

While the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G boasts superior processing power and a higher resolution main camera, the Motorola Moto G85 resonates more with my personal values and user experience preferences.

Why?

  • Brighter Display for Real-World Use: The dramatically brighter display is a game-changer for outdoor use. As someone who spends time outside, being able to clearly see my screen in sunlight is essential. This feature significantly enhances usability in everyday scenarios.
  • Ergonomics Matter: The slightly smaller and lighter design of the G85 aligns with my preference for a phone that's comfortable to hold and operate with one hand. It's a seemingly small detail that significantly impacts long-term user comfort.
  • Clean Software Experience: While customization is appealing, I value the clean, bloatware-free experience that near-stock Android provides on the Moto G85. This often translates to faster performance and quicker software updates.
  • Updated OS: Having the latest Android OS (14 at the time of this comparison) is crucial for security and accessing the newest features. The G85's more modern OS provides a future-proof advantage over the A73.

Ultimately, the Moto G85 offers a compelling blend of practicality, user-friendly design, and a modern software experience that aligns perfectly with my needs and preferences. It represents a thoughtful approach to mobile technology that prioritizes real-world usability over sheer specifications.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.