Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Apple iPhone 16 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 22, 2022 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.68 cm³ 82.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.7 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 181 g 170 g
Height 163.7 mm 147.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 71.6 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1179 x 2556
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 95.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.81 mAh/cm³ 43.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3561 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Adreno 642L Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 12 18
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs. Apple iPhone 16: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's move beyond the numbers and delve into the real-world implications of choosing between the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and the Apple iPhone 16. My analysis prioritizes the lived experience of using these devices, focusing on how design choices translate into tangible benefits for you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Feature CategorySamsung Galaxy A73 5GApple iPhone 16User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 12 (upgradable to 16), highly customizableiOS 18, known for simplicity and consistencyAndroid offers greater personalization, while iOS prioritizes ease of use. This impacts user control and aesthetic preferences.
Interaction Flow120Hz refresh rate delivers fluid scrolling and animations60Hz refresh rate, potentially less smooth visuallyThe A73 5G provides a noticeably smoother, more responsive feel during everyday use.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsRobust iOS accessibility suiteBoth platforms offer accessibility features, but specific options may vary. Deeper research into individual needs is recommended.
Design ErgonomicsLarger display (6.7") may be less comfortable for one-handed useSmaller display (6.1") and lighter weight (170g) enhance portabilityThe iPhone 16 offers a more compact and comfortable experience for users who prioritize one-handed operation and portability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're at a vibrant outdoor concert. The A73 5G's larger display makes it easier to share photos and videos with friends, but its lower brightness (compared to the iPhone 16's impressive 2000 nits) might hinder visibility in direct sunlight. The iPhone 16, with its superior brightness, ensures a clear view of your screen even under the midday sun, making capturing and sharing those memorable moments easier.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Profile: A Senior Citizen: The iPhone 16's simplified interface and consistent design language might be more intuitive for users less familiar with technology. However, the A73 5G's larger display and customizable interface could be beneficial for those with visual impairments or who prefer larger text sizes.

User Profile: A Creative Professional: The iPhone 16's powerful A18 chip and advanced camera features (like Cinematic Mode) would appeal to content creators. However, the A73 5G's expandable storage and longer battery life might be crucial for extended shooting sessions.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Prioritize:

  • Smooth Performance and Responsiveness: Choose the A73 5G for its 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Portability and One-Handed Use: The iPhone 16 is the clear winner.
  • Bright Outdoor Visibility: The iPhone 16's 2000 nits display excels in sunlight.
  • Customization and Personalization: Android offers more flexibility.
  • Raw Processing Power: The iPhone 16's A18 chip delivers significant performance gains.

My Choice: The Apple iPhone 16

While the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G offers compelling features like a larger display, higher refresh rate, and expandable storage, the iPhone 16's superior performance, brighter display, more compact design, and the cohesive iOS ecosystem win me over. As a technology communicator, I value the seamless user experience, the powerful creative tools, and the intuitive interface that the iPhone 16 offers. Its design philosophy aligns more closely with my personal preference for a device that effortlessly integrates into my life, providing a smooth and enjoyable user experience. The significant performance gap also ensures the iPhone 16 will remain a capable device for a longer period. While the A73 5G is a strong contender, the iPhone 16's overall package better suits my needs and priorities.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.