Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 August 25, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 107.28 cm³ 81.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 203 g 187 g
Height 165 mm 165.2 mm
Width 77.4 mm 71.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 6.9 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Graphite
  • Navy
  • Pink Gold
  • Bora Purple
  • Khaki

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 82.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 45.15 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 618 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A72 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableZ Flip4 offers a compact, pocketable design when folded; A72 is a typical slab phone.
Dimensions165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm165.2 × 71.9 × 6.9 mmA72 is wider and thicker, making the Z Flip4 more comfortable for one-handed use and pocketable when folded.
Weight203g187gZ Flip4 is lighter, leading to less fatigue during prolonged use.
Display
Size6.7"6.7"Both have the same screen size, offering a similar viewing area.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Z Flip4 has slightly more pixels, resulting in a marginally sharper image, but the difference is not drastically noticeable in most cases.
Pixel Density394 ppi426 ppiZ Flip4 will appear slightly sharper, but the difference is subtle.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnknownA72 has AMOLED, offering superior contrast, blacks, and vibrant colors, and better efficiency for dark themes, if Z Flip4 is not AMOLED that will give edge for A72 in that case.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzZ Flip4 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness800 nits1200 nitsZ Flip4 is significantly brighter, making it much easier to view in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 720G (8 nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Z Flip4's chipset is significantly more powerful, resulting in dramatically faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score285,0001,050,371Z Flip4 offers a massive performance advantage, handling demanding tasks and future software updates much better.
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 730Z Flip4's GPU is considerably more powerful, leading to enhanced graphics in games and apps.
Camera
Main Camera64MP f/1.812.2MP f/1.8A72 offers higher resolution photos; Z Flip4's larger pixels and sensor capture better low-light images.
Telephoto8MP f/2.4NoneA72 provides optical zoom capabilities, missing in Z Flip4.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.210MP f/2.4A72 has a higher resolution selfie camera; Z Flip4's larger pixels result in better low light pictures.
Wide Angle lens12MP f/2.213MP f/2.2Very similar specs for wide angle, barely any difference for user.
Macro Lens5MP f/2.4NoneA72 offers dedicated macro photography which is missing on Z Flip4.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps, EISUp to 4K@60fps, HDRBoth offer high quality videos, but the Z Flip4 can record with HDR for wider dynamic range. Z Flip4 also offers higher slow motion options.
DxOMark Score92 (Mobile)112 (Mobile)Z Flip4 offers a better camera experience based on the testing.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh3700mAhA72 has a much larger battery, suggesting longer battery life.
Charging25W fast charging25W fast charging, 15W WirelessZ Flip4 offers more convenient charging options with wireless and reverse wireless options, charging is a tie for the wired charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (Up to 12)Android 12 (Up to 14)Z Flip4 has a newer Android version, providing access to newer features and security updates.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi MiMOZ Flip4 offers faster Wi-Fi speeds and better performance in crowded networks.
Bluetooth5.05.1 LE, ANT+, APT-xZ Flip4 offers better efficiency and more features with bluetooth.
GPSStandardL1+L5 bands for higher accuracyZ Flip4 offers more precise location tracking with additional bands.
SIMNano SIM + Nano SIMNano SIM + eSIMZ Flip4 is better for those who like switching carriers digitally.
Storage
Internal128/256GB128/256/512GBZ Flip4 offers more storage options and capacity.
RAM6/8GB8GBBoth phones provide a good experience in multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage, so choose storage size according to your needs.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersStereo SpeakersA72 has the Dolby Atmos feature for enhanced audio, while both have stereo speakers.
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-mounted Fingerprint SensorZ Flip4 has more convenient fingerprint placement.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass VictusZ Flip4 has better screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsStandardStandard + BarometerZ Flip4 has additional sensors that could be beneficial to specific use-cases such as tracking altitude changes during hiking, or indoor navigation.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly larger battery (5000mAh vs. 3700mAh) offering potentially better battery life.
  • Dedicated Telephoto and Macro Cameras: Offers optical zoom and dedicated macro photography for more versatility.
  • Dolby Atmos Audio: Provides enhanced audio experience for immersive sound.
  • Potentially Better Display Technology: Potentially superior display with AMOLED offering deeper blacks, more vibrant colors (if the Z Flip4 does not have AMOLED) and better power efficiency for dark themes.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Compact and unique design with a smaller footprint when folded.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers superior speed for gaming, multitasking, and overall app performance.
  • Significantly Brighter Display: 1200 nits display is much easier to view in direct sunlight.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother animations.
  • More Advanced Charging: Faster wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities.
  • Newer Software: Comes with newer Android version and long term software support.
  • Better Camera Quality: Offers higher DxOMark scores and enhanced dynamic range for better photos.
  • More Storage Options: 512GB storage variant available.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6 and more precise GPS.
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers more advanced screen protection.

Trade-offs:

  • The A72 has a larger battery, but the Z Flip4 benefits from a more efficient processor.
  • The A72 has a telephoto and macro camera, but Z Flip4 has a better main camera.
  • The Z Flip4 is more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A72:

  • Ideal Users: Users who prioritize battery life, camera versatility, and a traditional, large-screen phone experience.
  • Use Cases:
    • Frequent travelers who need long-lasting battery life.
    • Users who enjoy taking photos with optical zoom and macro shots.
    • Budget-conscious users who still desire a large screen.
  • Price-to-Value: Provides a more affordable option with good value for everyday tasks and specific camera needs.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4:

  • Ideal Users: Users who desire cutting-edge technology, powerful performance, a compact form factor, and excellent camera quality.
  • Use Cases:
    • Tech enthusiasts who enjoy innovative designs.
    • Users who often multitask and need smooth performance.
    • Individuals who want a phone that's easy to carry.
    • Users who require excellent performance and are comfortable with a premium price point.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers a premium experience with top-tier specs, albeit at a higher price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: Are you comfortable paying a premium for cutting-edge design and top-tier performance, or are you looking for a more affordable option?
  2. Form Factor: Do you prefer the compact, foldable design of the Z Flip4, or the larger screen, traditional form factor of the A72?
  3. Primary Use Cases: Will you primarily use your phone for battery intensive activities, or tasks which requires performance such as gaming, multitasking or social media browsing?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User: If your budget is a primary concern, and you prefer a more traditional phone with decent camera features, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is recommended.
  • Performance & Innovation Seeker: If you value cutting-edge technology, powerful performance, a unique foldable design, and excellent camera quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 is the better choice.
  • Battery Life Priority: If having the longest battery life is a must, the Samsung Galaxy A72 will likely be more suitable.
  • Camera Versatility Priority: If having versatility in cameras, including optical zoom and macro photography, is a priority, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is recommended.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4. While the Galaxy A72 has a larger battery and a telephoto camera, the Z Flip4's superior processor, brighter 120Hz display, significantly better performance, and the advanced camera outweigh those advantages for me. Furthermore, the unique form factor of a foldable phone makes it more portable and enjoyable. Even though the Z Flip4 is more expensive, the leap in performance, features, and technology justifies the extra cost for a user like myself who would prefer the performance and new design.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.