1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm | A72 is slightly taller; A24 4G is marginally thinner. The size difference is small; both are large phones, but A24 is slightly more compact. |
| Weight | 203g | 195g | A24 4G is lighter by 8g, which may be noticeable during extended one-handed use. |
| Build Material | (Not Specified) | (Not Specified) | Both are likely made with plastic frames and backs. Durability will be similar but specific materials are not available. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | A72 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Both have a FHD+ display, pixel density is virtually identical; users won't see a visible difference in clarity. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 394 | 396 | Both phones offer sharp display with no major difference. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both provide vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast, resulting in a premium viewing experience. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smoother scrolling and animations than standard 60Hz displays, enhancing responsiveness. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 1000 nits | A24 4G's higher brightness makes it more readable in direct sunlight. This will make the display easier to see outside. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | A24 4G has a newer, more efficient chipset. Expect better performance and potentially better battery life. |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 411,900 | A24 4G has a much higher AnTuTu score. This translates to significantly better performance in daily tasks, gaming, and other demanding applications. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC2 | A24 4G's GPU, paired with its chipset, delivers better gaming and graphics performance, better graphic quality in apps as well as lower power consumption while gaming. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Rear Camera | 64MP (f/1.8, 0.80 µm pixel size) | 50MP (f/1.8) | A72 captures higher resolution photos in daylight. A24 4G should perform better in low light due to larger pixel sizes (not specified) |
| Telephoto Lens | 8MP (f/2.4, 1/4.4", 1.00 µm) | None | A72 offers optical zoom which the A24 4G lacks, allowing for closer and sharper images of distant subjects. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 12MP (f/2.2, 1.12 µm) | 5MP (f/2.2) | A72 captures much wider shots with more detail, ideal for landscapes and group photos. A24 4G will produce lower resolution wide shots. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP (f/2.4, 1.12 µm) | 2MP (f/2.4) | A72 can capture more detailed close-up shots, although quality will still be limited given smaller sensors. The 2MP lens is very basic on the A24 4G. |
| Front Camera | 32MP (f/2.2, 0.80 µm) | 13MP (f/2.2) | A72's higher-resolution front camera provides more detailed selfies and better quality for video calls. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps with EIS | A72 captures higher-quality videos, offering 4K recording for better detail, especially important for those who want high quality vlog or video content. |
| DxOMark Score | Mobile: 92 (Photo: 100, Video: 78) | Not available | A72’s scores indicate good camera performance for both stills and video. Note that this is an older phone. |
| Camera Features | Optical Zoom, Quad Camera, Manual Focus, Night Mode, OIS | Triple Camera, OIS | A72 has more advanced photography features, better for users who need flexibility, and better low-light performance. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life. Real-world performance may vary based on usage and the efficiency of each device's processor and software. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging, Li-Ion | 25W fast charging, Li-Polymer | Both support fast charging, the difference in battery chemistry is unlikely to have a major real-world impact. |
| Charging Features | 15W Fast Charger included, Non-removable | Non-removable | A72 includes a charger in the box; for the A24 4G, the charger is not included. |
Software & Connectivity
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11, Upgradable to 12 | Android 13, Upgradable to 17 | A24 4G offers a newer OS and is likely to receive software updates for a longer period of time, giving access to the latest features and security updates. |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, Display | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, Display | Both support the same Wi-Fi standards and features, providing similar wireless connectivity. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 with multiple profiles | 5.3 LE, A2DP | A24 4G has a newer Bluetooth version for slightly faster and more efficient connections with audio devices and peripherals as well as lower power consumption. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A24 4G has better location accuracy as it supports additional satellite system QZSS. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Both phones support using two SIM cards simultaneously. |
Storage, Audio, & Security
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage | 128 GB or 256 GB | 128 GB | A72 offers up to double the storage. Choose the 256GB variant if you require large local storage for photos, videos, and apps. |
| RAM | 6GB or 8GB | 4GB, 6GB or 8GB | Both offer similar RAM options. 8GB of RAM is optimal for more demanding users who switch between multiple apps and games. |
| Expandable Storage | Not supported | Not supported | Neither phone supports expandable storage. Users will need to choose a storage option that meets their needs at the time of purchase. |
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Basic Audio Features | A72 offers enhanced audio experience with richer, spatial sound and clearer audio. |
| Security | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | A24 4G's side-mounted fingerprint scanner is generally faster and more convenient than the A72's basic fingerprint sensor. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light, Hall | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | A72 offers a more comprehensive sensor suite, particularly the light sensor and hall sensor, which can enable more features and functionality in apps and games. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages
- Superior Camera System: Offers a telephoto lens for optical zoom, higher resolution wide-angle and macro lenses, plus a higher-resolution front camera. Overall, more versatile and better quality in most shooting scenarios, and better video quality due to 4K recording capability.
- Better Audio Quality: Includes Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers, resulting in a much more immersive audio experience for music, videos, and gaming.
- More Internal Storage Option: Up to 256GB option.
- More comprehensive sensor suite: Comes with a light sensor and hall sensor
- Charger Included: Comes with a 15W Fast Charger in the box
Practical Implications: The A72 is better for users who prioritize photography, videography, and audio quality. It is a more versatile multimedia device but note that it is an older model.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages
- Newer Chipset & Better Performance: The Helio G99 chipset offers significantly better performance in benchmarks and practical use and should have better battery efficiency.
- Brighter Display: The 1000 nits brightness makes the A24 4G more readable in direct sunlight.
- Newer Bluetooth Version: Bluetooth 5.3 LE offers more efficient connectivity.
- Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 13 out of the box which will mean more longer support with future updates.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Generally faster and more convenient than the A72's basic sensor.
- Better GPS: Has support for QZSS for better location accuracy
Practical Implications: The A24 4G is better for users who need a fast, responsive phone for daily use, gaming, and outdoor visibility. Its newer software also means longer support.
Significant Trade-offs
- Camera: A24 4G sacrifices a lot on camera capabilities to get a better performance chipset.
- Audio: A24 4G lacks the better audio capabilities of A72.
- Sensors: A24 4G lacks the Light and Hall sensors.
- Included Charger: The A24 4G does not come with a charger
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal User
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value versatile camera systems with optical zoom, higher quality lenses, and the flexibility of manual mode.
- Multimedia Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos, listen to music, and want the best possible audio experience with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers.
- Users who are okay with older devices: Users who want the extra flexibility for multimedia or are on a budget.
Use Cases:
- Taking photos in a variety of environments and conditions.
- Watching videos and enjoying immersive audio while commuting or at home.
- Video calls that make use of the high quality selfie camera.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Ideal User
- Performance-Focused Users: Those who prioritize responsiveness and smooth performance for daily tasks, social media, and mobile gaming.
- Outdoor Users: Individuals who need a phone with a bright screen that is readable in direct sunlight.
- Users on a budget: Users who would prefer better performance over the camera capabilities of the A72, and a phone that will receive future software updates.
Use Cases:
- Playing games with fast and fluid frame rates.
- Using GPS-based navigation apps while outdoors.
- Using their phone outside frequently for long periods of time.
- Those who want a phone with the latest features for the best value.
Price-to-Value Ratio
The A24 4G offers better performance for the price. The A72 is now an older phone but may be better for those who want more versatile camera functionality and better audio. The price of the A72 may have reduced making it a good budget device for those who are okay with the trade-offs.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is camera quality to you? If it’s crucial, the A72 is a better choice. If performance is the priority, the A24 4G excels.
- What are your primary use cases? If mostly gaming, or media consumption without needing to record, then the A24 4G may be better. If you need versatility in the camera, then A72 may be the better option.
- Do you require the best software support? If you prefer the newer Android OS and longer software update support, the A24 4G is the only option.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Casual User):
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Reason: Offers better performance for everyday use, a more efficient chip, a brighter screen, and newer software.
- Scenario 2 (Avid Photographer/Videographer):
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A72
- Reason: Provides better camera versatility with a dedicated telephoto lens, as well as superior audio for recording.
- Scenario 3 (Gaming):
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Reason: Provides the best performance with the Helio G99 chipset.
- Scenario 4 (Budget Conscious User):
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Reason: Newer chipset with better performance, and the latest software. The A72 may still be a viable option but it has outdated hardware.
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G.
Reasoning:
While the Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a more versatile camera system and superior audio, the A24 4G is a more well-rounded phone for modern users and for the value. The newer processor will offer much smoother performance for daily tasks, and its brighter display, newer Bluetooth version and better GPS are all more important factors for my personal use. The inclusion of the latest software version is very appealing, since I would prefer the latest features and security updates for longer.
The A24 4G's lack of a telephoto lens and the lower resolution of the other cameras are something I would have to live with. However, the improvement in performance and a brighter display is ultimately more valuable to me in the long term, and I can get good enough pictures with the available cameras. While the A72 is a capable phone, it's starting to show its age and the software support for the device will eventually end soon.
