Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Oppo Reno10 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 July 15, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 107.28 cm³ 96.4 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 203 g 185 g
Height 165 mm 162.4 mm
Width 77.4 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Ice Blue
  • Silvery Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 51.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A72 vs. Oppo Reno10

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Oppo Reno10Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm, 203g162.4 × 74.2 × 8 mm, 185gReno10 is more compact and lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and carrying. The A72 is larger and heavier.
Display
Size6.7"6.7"Both phones offer the same immersive screen size, ideal for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Both phones offer very similar sharpness, making them suitable for general use and watching videos. Minimal difference is not noticeable.
PPI394394Identical pixel density; both phones have sharp displays.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth displays offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzReno10 offers smoother scrolling, animations, and potentially a more responsive gaming experience.
Brightness800 nits950 nitsReno10 has better outdoor visibility, making the screen easier to see in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 720G (8 nm)Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Reno10's chipset is newer and more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score285,000541,500Reno10 offers significantly better performance, resulting in a much snappier experience.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G68 MC4Reno10's GPU provides better gaming and graphic processing capabilities.
Camera
Standard Camera64MP, f/1.8, 0.80µm64MP, f/1.7, 1/2", 0.70µm (OV64B)Reno10's wider aperture may capture slightly more light; has a larger sensor, possibly leading to better low-light performance.
Telephoto + Portrait8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4", 1.00µm (OV08A10)NoneA72 offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and portrait shots, a feature Reno10 lacks.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.80µm (Sony IMX709)A72's slightly wider aperture may lead to slightly better selfies in low light. Reno 10 has a slightly larger sensor, possibly leading to better low-light performance.
Telephoto lensNone32MP, f/2.0, 1/2.74", 0.80µm (Sony IMX709)Reno10 offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and portrait shots, a feature A72 lacks.
Wide Angle lens12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 1.14µm (Sony IMX355)A72 has a higher resolution wide-angle lens, potentially capturing slightly more detail. Both are very similar in practice.
Macro lens5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µmNoneA72 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots, a feature Reno10 lacks.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps with EISBoth capture 4k footage, but Reno10 can record 1080p video at a higher framerate (120, 480fps) which could result in a smoother playback and better slow motion options.
dxoMark ScoresMain: 92, Photo: 100, Video: 78N/AOnly A72 has been benchmarked; A72 has decent scores, but it's hard to compare without scores for Reno10.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer the same battery capacity; expect similar battery life under similar conditions.
Charging25W fast charging67W fast chargingReno10 charges significantly faster, allowing users to quickly top up their battery.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 13 (upgradable to 14)Reno10 offers a newer Android version out of the box, with the advantage of having an extra update.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6)Reno10 supports a newer Wi-Fi standard, offering faster speeds and better performance.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.3 LEReno10 has a newer Bluetooth version, which offers better energy efficiency and improved data transfer.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoReno10 supports more satellite systems, potentially resulting in slightly more precise location tracking.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth offer dual SIM capabilities.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB256 GBA72 is available in 128/256 GB configurations while Reno10 is only available with 256GB.
RAM6/8 GB8 GBReno10 offers consistent 8 GB of RAM for smooth multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersBasic audioA72 offers enhanced audio quality for media consumption.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorBoth phones feature a fingerprint sensor for biometric security.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:

  • Dedicated Telephoto & Macro Lenses: Offers more versatile photography options with optical zoom and close-up shots.
  • Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos: Provides a more immersive audio experience for media consumption.
  • Slightly wider aperture selfie lens: Captures slightly more light in low light situations.
  • Included Fast Charger: Comes with a 15W fast charger included, a small additional cost saving.

Oppo Reno10 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful chipset and GPU leading to better app performance, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Faster Charging: 67W charging replenishes the battery much faster than A72's 25W.
  • 120Hz Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling, animations, and overall user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility in bright conditions.
  • Newer Software: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, offering more modern features and security.
  • Newer Bluetooth Standard: Better energy efficiency and data transfer.
  • Telephoto lens: Has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and portrait shots, offering a better photo quality than digital zoom.
  • Better Video Recording capabilities: Can record 1080p at higher framerates.

Trade-offs:

  • The A72 offers more versatile photography with its dedicated telephoto and macro lenses, while Reno10 prioritizes speed and display quality.
  • The A72's audio quality is superior, but the Reno10's overall performance is much better.
  • The A72 has slightly better selfie camera, while Reno10 has better main and telephoto camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A72:

  • Ideal Users:
    • Users who prioritize a versatile camera system with telephoto and macro capabilities.
    • Users who enjoy media consumption and value superior audio quality (Dolby Atmos).
    • Users on a budget who value the lower price and prefer a device with included charger.
  • Use Cases:
    • Casual photography with diverse shooting scenarios.
    • Watching movies and videos with good audio.
    • Users that are not focused on gaming or graphic intensive tasks.

Oppo Reno10:

  • Ideal Users:
    • Users who prioritize fast performance, a smooth display, and quick charging.
    • Users who frequently multitask and play graphically demanding games.
    • Users who want a modern software experience with the latest Android version.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gaming and demanding apps.
    • Frequent multitasking and heavy usage.
    • Users that like the newer software experience and want to enjoy the device in bright conditions.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Do I prioritize camera versatility or overall performance? If you need telephoto and macro lenses, A72 wins; for speed and smooth experience, Reno10 is better.
  2. Is fast charging a must-have, or am I okay with slower speeds? Reno10 charges much faster, a key difference for heavy users.
  3. Do I value enhanced audio, or is good enough audio sufficient? The A72 has better speakers, but the Reno10 is better in almost every other aspect.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a budget-conscious user who values a versatile camera: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72.
  • For a user who prioritizes smooth performance and fast charging: Choose the Oppo Reno10.
  • For a user that does not play heavy games and cares about image quality: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72.
  • For a user who needs a device that is responsive and has a modern experience: Choose the Oppo Reno10.

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Oppo Reno10. The primary reason is the significant performance advantage offered by its newer chipset, smoother display, and much faster charging. While the Samsung Galaxy A72 has a more versatile camera setup with dedicated telephoto and macro lenses and slightly better selfie camera, the Reno10's performance boost is a more compelling advantage for the majority of use cases. The 120Hz display and quick charging are features that directly impact the daily user experience, making the Reno10 a more appealing overall package despite its trade-offs in audio quality. Also, the Reno10 has a telephoto lens, which is a plus for portrait shots.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.