1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | 166 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm | Galaxy A72 is slightly wider; both similar in height and thickness. |
Weight | 203g | 190g | Nokia G60 is 13g lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.7" | 6.58" | Galaxy A72 has a slightly larger display, which may be preferred for media consumption. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Both are virtually identical in sharpness. |
Pixel Density | 394 PPI | 401 PPI | Both have similar pixel density, providing a sharp display. |
Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Galaxy A72 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better outdoor visibility with its AMOLED display. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Nokia G60's 120Hz display will offer smoother scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits | Galaxy A72 has significantly better outdoor visibility under bright sunlight. Nokia G60 brightness spec is missing |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Nokia G60's newer chipset offers a noticeable increase in benchmark performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 410,072 | Nokia G60 is significantly faster in benchmarks, translating to faster app loading and smoother everyday operation. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | Nokia G60's newer GPU offers slightly better gaming performance. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 64MP f/1.8 | 50MP f/1.8 | Galaxy A72 captures more detailed photos with its higher-resolution sensor. |
Telephoto Lens | 8MP f/2.4 (1/4.4") | None | Galaxy A72 has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and portrait mode. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP f/2.2 | 8MP f/2.0 | Galaxy A72 captures much more detailed selfies with its higher resolution. Nokia G60 has a slightly wider aperture. |
Wide Angle Lens | 12MP f/2.2 | 5MP f/2.0 | Galaxy A72 captures much more detailed ultrawide photos with its higher resolution. Nokia G60 has a slightly wider aperture |
Portrait (depth) | None | 2MP f/2.4 | Nokia G60 has dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode. |
Macro Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | None | Galaxy A72 has dedicated macro lens for closeup pictures. |
Video | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@30fps | Galaxy A72 records higher quality videos with 4K support and OIS |
DxOMark Score | 92 (Mobile), 100 (Photo), 78 (Video) | N/A | Galaxy A72 has been tested by DxOMark and received a good score, while no data for Nokia G60. |
Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, PDAF | Triple camera, CDAF | Galaxy A72 offers a more versatile camera system with OIS and PDAF, while Nokia G60 has a simpler configuration. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 4500mAh | Galaxy A72 has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 20W Fast Charging | Galaxy A72 charges slightly faster. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11, upgradable to 12 | Android 12 | Nokia G60 has a newer version of Android out of the box. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Nokia G60 supports newer Wi-Fi standard, offering faster speeds. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 LE | Nokia G60 has a newer Bluetooth version, offering better power efficiency. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Nokia G60 has better location accuracy. |
SIM | Dual SIM (Nano SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Nokia G60 has eSIM support. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128/256 GB | 64/128 GB | Galaxy A72 has more storage capacity available (256GB vs 128GB max). |
RAM | 6/8 GB | 4/6 GB | Galaxy A72 has more RAM, which may lead to better multitasking. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phones supports external storage. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Basic | Galaxy A72 has a better audio experience with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers. |
Security | |||
Features | Basic Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted Fingerprint sensor | Nokia G60 has an easier to reach and more advanced fingerprint scanner |
Build Quality | |||
Protection | Unknown | Gorilla Glass 5 | Nokia G60 has better screen protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Galaxy A72 has additional sensors: Compass and Hall sensor |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency. Significantly brighter screen.
- More Versatile Camera System: Dedicated telephoto and macro lenses, higher-resolution main, ultrawide, and selfie cameras, OIS, and 4K video recording.
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery vs 4500mAh, provides longer battery life.
- Better Audio: Dolby Atmos and Stereo Speakers for a more immersive audio experience.
- More RAM: Option for 8GB of RAM.
- More Storage: Option for 256GB of internal storage.
- Additional Sensors: Compass and Hall sensors
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging.
- DxOMark tested: Camera quality has been tested and reviewed.
Nokia G60 Advantages:
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate for smoother animations.
- Better Performance: Newer Snapdragon 695 chipset offers better benchmark scores for faster app loading and overall snappiness.
- Newer Android Version: Android 12 out of the box, likely to receive longer software support.
- Better Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 LE for faster and more efficient connections.
- More Accurate GPS: Supports QZSS for more precise location tracking.
- eSIM Support: Supports eSIM for greater flexibility with mobile carriers.
- Gorilla Glass 5: Superior screen protection.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint sensor: More convenient and advanced than the basic fingerprint sensor.
- Slightly lighter: 13g lighter than Samsung.
Trade-offs:
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 provides a better display and camera experience, but with a older chipset.
- The Nokia G60 offers better performance and a smoother display, but lacks an impressive camera and a large storage option.
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 is heavier but offers better camera hardware and audio.
- The Nokia G60 lacks important specs such as screen brightness.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal User:
- Multimedia Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos, enjoy vibrant colors, and need a brighter screen for outdoor visibility.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera with telephoto and macro capabilities.
- Audio Lovers: Users who appreciate good audio quality with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers.
- Users Needing Long Battery Life: Those who need a phone that lasts throughout the day without frequent charging.
- Multitaskers: Users that want a larger RAM and storage.
Use Cases:
- Watching movies and shows with rich colors and clear audio.
- Taking diverse photos and videos with its triple camera setup.
- Gaming with good audio and display.
- Navigating outside on bright sunny days.
Nokia G60 Ideal User:
- Performance Seekers: Users who prioritize a smooth and responsive experience with fast app loading.
- Connectivity-Focused: Users who need the latest Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
- Tech-Savvy Users: Users who like the convenience of eSIM support and advanced location tracking.
- Users who value a smoother display: 120Hz display will provide a better daily experience.
- Users who value better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5.
Use Cases:
- Smooth multitasking and fast app switching.
- Fast downloads and streaming using Wi-Fi 6.
- Using location-based apps with improved precision.
- Travelers who want the flexibility of eSIM and improved GPS.
- Gamers that will benefit from a smoother display.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- If the price difference is minimal, the Samsung Galaxy A72 may offer better value for its superior display, camera, and audio features.
- If the price of the Nokia G60 is significantly lower and the user prioritizes performance and connectivity, the value ratio is favorable.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Preference: Do you prioritize vibrant colors and high contrast (AMOLED) or a smoother experience (120Hz refresh rate)? Is bright display for outdoor usage important?
- Camera Needs: Do you need a versatile camera with telephoto, macro capabilities and 4K recording, or is a standard camera setup sufficient?
- Performance vs. Features: Do you prefer a smoother experience and advanced connectivity, or a more well-rounded set of features?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Photography Enthusiast: If camera capabilities and display are the top priorities, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is the better choice with its versatile cameras, brighter screen, and better color reproduction.
- Scenario 2: Heavy Gamer: If high performance and a smooth experience are essential, the Nokia G60 is a better option, but is not necessarily a good phone for gaming given the other hardware limitations such as smaller battery and basic audio quality.
- Scenario 3: Everyday User: If you are an everyday user who prioritizes a balance of performance and display quality and doesn't need the best camera, the Nokia G60 should be considered first. But if the camera and the display are important, then the Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit.
My Choice
I would personally choose the Samsung Galaxy A72. While the Nokia G60 offers a smoother display and slightly better performance in benchmarks, the A72 provides a more complete user experience that better aligns with my priorities. The superior AMOLED display with higher brightness, combined with a versatile camera system that includes optical zoom and a dedicated macro lens, makes it a more suitable device for my daily use. The higher resolution main and selfie cameras will give me better images for my everyday use. Furthermore, the larger battery is a significant advantage for long-term use, and the added audio quality with Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers is important. The slightly older chipset on the Samsung, is something that I am willing to trade-off. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a more premium experience that aligns better with my preferences.