1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Nokia G100 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | 166.6 × 76.7 × 8.9 mm | Nokia G100 is slightly taller and thicker, but differences are minimal. |
| Weight | 203g | 195.1g | Nokia G100 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.52" | Samsung A72 offers a slightly larger screen for immersive viewing. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Samsung A72 has significantly sharper visuals, better for reading, videos, and photos. |
| PPI | 394 | 269 | Samsung A72 provides much clearer and more detailed images. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Samsung A72 has superior contrast, vibrant colors, and better power efficiency with dark mode. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 60Hz | Samsung A72 has smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits | Samsung A72 is much more visible outdoors in sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Samsung A72 offers faster processing for demanding apps and games. |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 201,615 | Samsung A72 provides a noticeably smoother and snappier experience. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 | Samsung A72 has superior graphics performance for gaming. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard | 64MP, f/1.8 | 13MP, f/2.0 | Samsung A72 captures significantly more detailed photos, especially in low light. |
| Telephoto/Portrait | 8MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung A72 allows for optical zoom and portrait shots. |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.4 | Samsung A72 takes much higher resolution selfies. |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2 | 5MP, f/2.2 | Samsung A72 has a higher resolution wide-angle lens. |
| Portrait Mode (Depth) | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | Nokia G100 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait effects. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | Samsung A72 allows for close-up macro photography. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps | Samsung A72 can record higher quality 4K video. |
| OIS | Yes | No | Samsung A72 has better image and video stabilization. |
| DxOMark Score | 92 | N/A | Samsung A72 has a rated good camera performance. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer similar battery life. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 15W Fast Charging | Samsung A72 charges significantly faster. |
| Charger included | Yes | No | Samsung A72 includes a fast charger in the box. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Upgradable to 12 | Android 12 | Nokia G100 ships with a newer OS. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Similar WiFi support on both. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 LE | Similar Bluetooth connectivity with slight variations in profiles supported. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS | Samsung A72 offers more accurate GPS with additional satellite support. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano) | Both phones support dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 32GB/128GB | Samsung A72 offers more storage options. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 3GB/4GB | Samsung A72 offers more RAM, good for multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio | Stereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos | 2 Microphones | Samsung A72 has better audio output, Nokia G100 has better audio input. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic | Side-mounted | Nokia G100 has a more convenient side-mounted sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Nokia G100's screen is more durable against scratches and drops. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Barometer | Nokia G100 has an additional environmental sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness, providing a much better visual experience, particularly for multimedia consumption and outdoor use.
- Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset offers smoother multitasking and gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100.
- Better Camera System: The Galaxy A72 features higher resolution sensors, optical zoom, OIS, and a versatile set of lenses which leads to superior photo and video quality.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging is notably quicker than the 15W charging of the Nokia G100.
- More RAM and Storage: The availability of up to 8GB RAM and 256GB storage gives the Galaxy A72 an edge in multitasking and file storage.
Practical Implications:
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 is significantly better for users who consume multimedia content and like mobile photography, especially in challenging lighting conditions or for outdoor use. It offers a premium visual and performance experience.
- Faster charging and more RAM/storage enhance productivity and overall usability.
- The telephoto lens provides greater flexibility for photography.
Nokia G100 Advantages:
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 12 out of the box.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Often preferred by some users for ease of access.
- Screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 offers added durability.
- Barometer: Provides environmental readings.
- Lighter: More comfortable to hold for longer durations.
- Lower price: This is not explicitly stated but can be implied as this is a lower-specced device.
Practical Implications:
- The Nokia G100 appeals to users who value a simple, durable device with good battery life and who aren't looking for top-tier performance or camera capabilities.
- The newer OS provides more up to date features.
- The side-mounted fingerprint sensor can be more convenient for some users.
- It's a more affordable option for basic smartphone needs.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Users choosing the Nokia G100 will sacrifice display quality, camera versatility, performance, and charging speed.
- Users choosing the Samsung Galaxy A72 will get a device that is heavier and the lack of an expandable storage may be limiting.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal Users:
- Multimedia Enthusiasts: Users who watch videos, movies, and play games regularly, due to its superior display and audio quality.
- Photography Lovers: Those who want a capable camera system for different types of photography and videography, with optical zoom and OIS.
- Power Users: Individuals who need smooth multitasking and performance, benefiting from its faster chipset and larger RAM.
- Users who value screen brightness: Those who are often in bright outdoor light will greatly benefit from the 800 nit brightness.
Use Cases:
- Watching movies and TV shows on the go.
- Taking high-quality photos and videos for social media or personal use.
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
- Using the device as a primary computer with multiple apps running simultaneously.
Nokia G100 Ideal Users:
- Budget-conscious buyers: Users looking for a functional smartphone at a lower price point.
- Basic smartphone users: Those primarily using their phones for calls, texts, browsing, and casual app use.
- Users who prioritize durability: Those who require a phone with basic screen protection against everyday wear and tear.
- Users looking for a longer lasting phone: The lower resolution and less intense chipset will result in longer battery life.
- Users with environmental needs: Those who would benefit from a barometer sensor.
Use Cases:
- Daily communication and web browsing.
- Basic photography for simple needs.
- Long battery life for extended use without charging.
- Durable design for daily use.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 offers a higher performance and camera quality, justifying its cost for specific users.
- The Nokia G100 provides a more affordable and practical option for users with basic needs.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is my primary use case for a smartphone? (Multimedia, photography, gaming, basic daily tasks)
- How important is display quality and outdoor visibility? (Do you watch a lot of videos or use your phone under bright light?)
- What is my budget? (Do you need top-tier performance and features or are you looking for a functional device at a lower price?)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Multimedia Lover): If you primarily use your phone for watching videos, playing games, and browsing content, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is the clear choice due to its superior display, performance, and audio quality.
- Scenario 2 (Budget-Conscious User): If you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks and want a durable device that lasts all day without breaking the bank, the Nokia G100 provides a good balance of features and affordability.
- Scenario 3 (Photography Enthusiast): If camera quality and versatility are important, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is much more capable, offering higher resolution sensors, OIS, and optical zoom.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A72. While the Nokia G100 offers some advantages like a newer OS, the side-mounted fingerprint sensor and screen protection, the overall package of the A72 is just much more compelling for my use case. I heavily value a good screen for viewing multimedia content, and the AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate and 800 nits of brightness on the A72 is significantly better than the screen of the G100. Additionally, the superior camera system is also a big draw for me as I like taking photos on my phone. Finally, the faster chipset and greater RAM of the A72 will lead to a snappier overall experience.
