1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers a compact, pocketable design when folded; Samsung is a standard non foldable smartphone |
| Dimensions | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | 171.4 × 74 × 7.1 mm | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is taller but thinner and less wide when unfolded. Samsung Galaxy A72 has a larger overall volume |
| Weight | 203g | 189g | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is slightly lighter, making it a bit more comfortable to hold for extended periods |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.9" | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has slightly more screen real estate for content consumption |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2640 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is slightly sharper, but both are excellent for everyday use |
| PPI | 394 | 413 | Similar pixel density, meaning the difference in clarity is minimal |
| Technology | AMOLED | Unknown | Samsung Galaxy A72 likely offers better contrast and color quality (deeper blacks). The Motorola Razr's display technology is not specified |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 165Hz | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra provides much smoother scrolling and animations, making it feel more responsive |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 3000 nits | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has much higher brightness, significantly better for outdoor visibility in direct sunlight |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers vastly superior performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 1,625,000 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has significantly better performance across all areas based on benchmarks. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 735 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra's GPU is substantially more powerful, improving gaming and graphics-intensive tasks |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 4000mAh | Samsung Galaxy A72 has a 20% larger battery, likely offering longer battery life for most users |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | 15W Charger Included | 15W Wireless, Reverse Charging | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers more charging flexibility |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Samsung Galaxy A72 has slightly higher resolution, but sensor size of Motorola Razr 50 Ultra may yield better low light results (sensor size is only given for motorola) |
| Telephoto | 8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4" | 50MP, f/2.0, 1/2.76" | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is significantly superior for zoomed photos with higher resolution and larger sensor |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.2 | 32MP, f/2.4 | Samsung Galaxy A72 has a slightly wider aperture for slightly better low light performance. |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2 | N/A | Samsung Galaxy A72 has a dedicated ultra-wide lens for capturing wide scenes |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | N/A | Samsung Galaxy A72 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 4K@60fps, 1080p@960fps | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has more advanced video recording capabilities and slow motion support |
| DXOMark Score | Mobile: 92, Photo: 100, Video: 78 | N/A | Samsung Galaxy A72 has been benchmarked with a decent score, Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has not been tested by DxOMark |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, Manual focus, HDR, Night Mode | Dual camera, Ultra stable video, Laser autofocus (LAF), RAW, Night Vision | Both offer different specific features, users should consider their preferences. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Upgradable to 12 | Android 14, Upgradable to 17 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a more recent OS with future upgrades guaranteed, ensuring a better experience longer |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11be (WiFi 7) | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra supports the latest Wi-Fi standards for faster, more reliable connections |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 LE | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers a more recent Bluetooth version for enhanced audio and connection stability |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra supports SUPL location services |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM) | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra supports eSIM for more flexible carrier switching |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256 GB | 256/512 GB | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers significantly more storage capacity |
| RAM | 6/8 GB | 12 GB | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra provides ample RAM for smooth multitasking and demanding apps |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 Microphones | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a slight edge with 3 microphones for enhanced audio recording |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra offers a more modern and convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has much better screen protection |
| Sensors | |||
| Features | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity | Both have comprehensive sensor suites, Motorola adds gravity sensor, Samsung adds Hall and Geomagnetic sensor |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and Adreno 735 GPU offer significantly faster processing, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 720G.
- Advanced Display: A 165Hz refresh rate and 3000 nits brightness significantly enhance the viewing experience, particularly in bright sunlight and for fluid animations.
- Modern Software: Running on Android 14, ensures access to the latest features and longer software support.
- Better Telephoto Camera: The 50MP telephoto camera with its bigger sensor and wider aperture is much better for zoomed photos than the 8MP camera on the A72.
- Faster Charging and Wireless Charging: Faster 45W charging, alongside 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging provides convenient charging options.
- Higher Quality Build and Better Screen Protection: The Gorilla Glass Victus protection is a big advantage.
- Foldable Design: Offers a unique, compact design.
- More Storage & RAM: 12 GB of RAM and 256 or 512GB of internal storage compared to the A72's 6/8GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage.
- Advanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 LE for better and more stable connections.
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery provides longer battery life, especially beneficial for users who prioritize endurance.
- Dedicated Wide and Macro Lenses: Offers more camera versatility with a dedicated ultra-wide and macro lens.
- AMOLED Display: Offers high color quality and deep blacks for better viewing experience in low light.
- More mature camera system: DxOMark testing indicates the Samsung Galaxy A72 has an overall better photo and video taking experience (although the Razr 50 Ultra has not been tested)
Trade-offs:
- Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Sacrifices battery capacity for a foldable form factor, a more advanced display, and superior performance.
- Samsung Galaxy A72: Offers a more standard design with longer battery life at the cost of significant performance and display quality.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal Users for Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:
- Tech Enthusiasts: Users who want the latest technology, a cutting-edge foldable design, and top-tier performance.
- Power Users: Users who need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
- Frequent Travelers: Users who value fast charging, convenient wireless charging, and a compact design.
- Content Creators: Users who need a phone with high-quality video recording, excellent display and a telephoto lens.
- Users Who Value a High Refresh Rate and Bright Display: Great for outdoor use and for those who enjoy smooth animations.
Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A72:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Users who want a reliable smartphone with a decent camera setup and a long-lasting battery.
- Casual Users: Users who prioritize battery life, a user friendly UI, and do not perform demanding tasks often.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value the versatility of a dedicated wide and macro lenses as well as the DxOMark camera scores.
- Users Who Value AMOLED screens: Users who prefer the deeper blacks and better colour contrast.
Specific Use Cases:
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:
- Gaming: Smooth, high-refresh-rate display and a powerful GPU provide an immersive gaming experience.
- Video Editing: Fast processor and ample RAM enable efficient editing of videos on the go.
- Outdoor Use: High brightness makes it easy to see the screen in direct sunlight.
- Commuting: Compact size when folded makes it pocketable and easy to carry.
- Photography: Great telephoto camera quality and the ability to use the phone in a tripod like manner when folded.
Samsung Galaxy A72:
- All-Day Use: Long battery life for a full day of use without the need to recharge.
- Casual Photography: Wide and Macro lenses offer more creative options when photographing.
- Media Consumption: AMOLED display provides excellent visuals for streaming video.
- Everyday Tasks: Sufficient performance for social media, browsing, and other everyday tasks.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance Needs: How important are high-performance gaming, video editing, and multitasking capabilities? If these are critical, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is better.
- Form Factor and Portability: Is a compact foldable design more valuable than a standard large screen? The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is compact, while the A72 is a traditional smartphone.
- Battery Life vs. Fast Charging: Is it more important to have long battery life, or the ability to charge the device quickly? The Galaxy A72 offers a bigger battery, whereas the Razr offers faster charging.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (High Performance and Portability): If you prioritize a powerful device with a modern and compact form factor, and don't mind sacrificing some battery life and the macro and wide camera lenses, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better choice.
- Scenario 2 (Long Battery Life and Camera Versatility): If you need a phone that lasts all day, and value a versatile camera setup with wide angle and macro lenses, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is more suitable.
- Scenario 3 (Balanced Needs with Modern Features): If you want a modern phone that is better in almost every way, with a high refresh rate, great performance, fast charging and is more future proof, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is superior.
What I Would Choose and Why
Personally, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. While I value a good battery life, the significant advantages of the Razr 50 Ultra are too compelling to ignore. The dramatically superior performance of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, combined with the 165Hz display and higher brightness, would offer a much smoother and more enjoyable user experience. The more advanced camera system on the Razr and its better video quality is also a big factor.
While the Samsung Galaxy A72 has a bigger battery and an extra macro and wide lens, the massive performance difference, faster charging, superior screen quality, and the futuristic foldable form factor make the Razr a more attractive option, especially as I tend to upgrade my phone every few years and prefer the latest technology. While the battery may be smaller, the faster charging would compensate for this, and the advantages in other areas are hard to pass up. Additionally, the advanced connectivity (Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 LE) will be beneficial.
