1. Specifications Comparison
Design
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
Dimensions | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | 161.2 × 73.9 × 8.5 mm | The A72 is larger and bulkier, potentially feeling less comfortable for smaller hands. The G71 is more compact and easier to handle. |
Weight | 203g | 179g | The G71 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and easier to carry around. |
Build | Standard | Standard | Both phones are standard smartphones, with no foldable design |
Display
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
Size | 6.7" | 6.4" | The A72 has a larger screen, better for media consumption and multi-tasking, while the G71 is more pocketable. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have the same sharpness. No noticeable difference in clarity. |
PPI | 394 | 411 | Both offer very sharp visuals and similar viewing experience |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 60Hz | The A72 offers a smoother experience in UI navigation, scrolling, and supported games. |
Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits | The A72's display is much brighter, making it significantly more readable outdoors in bright sunlight. The lack of brightness data for G71 makes it hard to determine outdoor visibility. |
Performance
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) | The G71 has a newer chipset with a smaller process (6nm) offering better power efficiency and performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 396,564 | The G71 is significantly faster in day-to-day tasks and gaming. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 | The G71 has a slightly newer GPU, offering enhanced graphics performance for gaming and graphic-intensive apps. |
Camera
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm | The A72 captures more detailed images with more megapixels, while the G71's sensor size could imply better low-light performance (though sensor size data for A72 is missing). |
Telephoto + Portrait | 8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4", 1.00µm | N/A | The A72 has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and portrait shots, which the G71 lacks. |
Selfie | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm | 16MP, f/2.2, 1.00µm | The A72 captures more detailed selfies with significantly higher resolution. |
Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | The A72 captures wider shots with better resolution, while the pixel size remains the same. |
Macro | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4 | The A72 has a higher resolution macro lens, potentially capturing more detailed close-up shots. |
Video | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS | Up to 1080p@60fps | The A72 can record in 4K, offering higher quality video recording compared to the G71. |
Stabilization | EIS | None | The A72 has electronic image stabilization for smoother video recording |
Slow-motion | 120fps | 60fps | The A72 captures slow-motion videos at a higher frame rate |
DXOMark | 92 (Mobile), 100 (Photo), 78 (Video) | N/A | The A72 has a tested and reviewed camera with strong still image performance; G71 does not have the same review data. |
Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, Manual, Night Mode | Triple camera, Laser AF, RAW | The A72 has better optical features and night mode, while the G71 has raw photo capture and laser autofocus. |
Battery
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both should provide similar battery life for typical usage. |
Charging | 25W fast charging | 33W fast charging | The G71 charges faster, reducing the time spent plugged in. |
Features | 15W Fast Charger included | None | The A72 comes with a fast charger in the box, while this is not specified for the G71. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages
- Superior Display: Larger screen size and higher refresh rate for smoother visuals. Significantly higher brightness is essential for outdoor visibility.
- More Versatile Camera System: Offers a telephoto lens, a higher-resolution selfie camera, and 4K video recording with EIS. Offers additional features like OIS, night mode and more robust video recording capabilities.
- Tested Camera Performance: DXOMARK testing shows high photo quality, useful for those who prioritize still image performance
- Included Fast Charger: Comes with a 15W fast charger in the box, while the G71's box contents are not specified.
- Stereo Speakers: Better audio experience with stereo speakers.
- Wider array of Bluetooth profile support: Supports a variety of Bluetooth profiles, which could enhance functionality with some devices.
- Compass Sensor: Includes a compass, which is useful for navigation and some gaming applications
Motorola Moto G71 5G Advantages
- Better Performance: Newer, more efficient chipset (6nm vs 8nm) and significantly higher AnTuTu score suggest faster app loading and smoother gaming.
- Faster Charging: 33W fast charging will allow for shorter charge times, a great convenience for users.
- Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry around due to its smaller dimensions and lighter weight.
- Laser Autofocus: Can provide faster and more accurate focus, specifically in low light conditions.
- RAW Photo Support: Allows for more flexibility in post-processing for photography enthusiasts.
- Latest Android OS: Comes with a newer version of Android out of the box.
Trade-offs
- A72: Sacrifices performance and portability for a superior display, camera flexibility, and included charger.
- G71: Sacrifices the telephoto lens, a higher-quality screen, and other camera features for better performance, ergonomics, and faster charging.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Ideal User: Media consumers, photographers, users who prioritize display quality and camera versatility, someone who uses their phone primarily indoors or in controlled lighting conditions.
- Use Cases: Watching videos, browsing social media, capturing detailed photos, casual gaming, and those who like to have a built-in fast charger.
- Justification: The A72 excels with its vibrant, bright display, multi-lens camera system, including OIS and 4K video capabilities, and a good photo camera performance.
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- Ideal User: Performance-oriented users, gamers, people who prioritize battery charging speed and portability, people who are seeking for a more streamlined smartphone experience.
- Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, multitasking, prolonged use on the go, users who prioritize faster charging over other features.
- Justification: The G71 excels with its better performance, lightweight design, and quicker charging capability. It caters to users who need fast and reliable performance for gaming and everyday tasks.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers
- Do you prioritize display quality and camera versatility over performance? If yes, the A72 is likely a better choice.
- Is portability and performance a priority over camera features and display brightness? If yes, the G71 may be more suitable.
- How important is fast charging and having a charger included in the box? If quick charging is critical, the G71 wins. If having a charger in the box is needed, the A72 wins.
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- Scenario 1: The Mobile Photographer: The Samsung Galaxy A72 is recommended due to its more versatile camera system with telephoto lens, OIS, 4K recording, and higher resolution sensors. DXOMark scores indicate a good camera performance.
- Scenario 2: The On-the-Go Gamer: The Motorola Moto G71 5G is recommended due to its superior performance, lighter design, and faster charging, better for gaming and daily activities on the go.
- Scenario 3: The Everyday Media Consumer: The Samsung Galaxy A72 is recommended due to its brighter display with a higher refresh rate and stereo speakers, which offers a better experience for watching videos and browsing social media.
My Choice
Personally, I would choose the Motorola Moto G71 5G. While the Samsung A72 has some compelling features like the superior screen and better camera system, the enhanced performance of the Snapdragon 695 is a key advantage. I value quick and smooth operation, which the Motorola offers in spades, and the faster charging capability is a significant plus in my day-to-day usage, especially when on the move. The slightly smaller and lighter profile is a benefit too. The performance boost that the G71 offers is not negligible and would outweigh the other benefits for my preferences. While I do appreciate the better camera offered by the A72, the performance boost and the faster charging are more valuable for me.