Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A72 vs. Motorola Moto G24
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Launch Date | 2021-03-26 | 2024-02-06 | Motorola Moto G24 is significantly newer, potentially offering more up-to-date software and features |
Size | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm | A72 is slightly larger and bulkier, while G24 is more compact. G24 may be more comfortable for smaller hands. |
Weight | 203g | 181g | G24 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended holding and less noticeable in pockets. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.7" | 6.56" | A72 has a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1612 | A72 offers a significantly sharper display with more detail, better for reading, browsing, and high-definition content. |
PPI | 394 | 269 | A72 provides crisper text and images due to its higher pixel density, enhancing the viewing experience. |
Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A72 has superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, better for media and viewing angles. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits | A72 offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight, making it easier to see the screen. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | Helio G85 (12nm) | A72's Snapdragon chipset offers marginally better processing power, resulting in slightly faster app loading and overall responsiveness. |
AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 266,894 | A72 demonstrates a small performance advantage in benchmarks, but real-world difference might be minimal for everyday tasks. |
GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MC2 | A72 may offer slightly better graphics performance in gaming and graphically intensive tasks. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | A72 has higher resolution primary camera for more detailed shots, but both have the same aperture which affects low light performance. |
Telephoto/Portrait | 8MP, f/2.4 | N/A | A72 includes a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing for optical zoom and better portrait photography. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.0 | A72 has much higher resolution for sharper selfies, while G24's wider aperture captures more light in low light conditions. |
Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A72 offers much better ultra-wide-angle photos with more detail, useful for landscapes and group photos. |
Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A72 has higher resolution for better detail in close-up macro shots. |
Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | A72 can record higher-resolution 4K videos and smoother 1080p with EIS for better video quality and stability, G24 maxes at 1080p. |
DXOMark Score | 92 (Mobile) | Not Available | A72's camera performance has been validated with a reasonable score for its camera capabilities. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer similar battery life for daily use. |
Charging | 25W fast charging, Li-Ion | 15W fast charging, Li-Polymer | A72 charges significantly faster, allowing for quicker power-ups. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 14 | G24 ships with newer Android version and may have longer support in the future, however A72 is upgradable to 12. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11ac, dual-band | 802.11ac, dual-band | Both offer standard dual-band WiFi connectivity. A72 supports Wi-Fi Display as well. |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 LE | Both offer comparable Bluetooth features, with slight feature differences. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both offer comprehensive satellite navigation support, with G24 supporting SUPL |
SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both support dual SIM functionality for using two different phone numbers. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer ample storage for most users. |
RAM | 6GB/8GB | 4GB/8GB | Both are available with enough RAM for smooth multitasking and app switching. The 8GB version will run smoother. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage, so the on board storage is the limit. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Both offer enhanced audio quality with stereo speakers for an immersive audio experience. |
Security | |||
Fingerprint | Basic Fingerprint | Side-mounted Fingerprint | G24 has a more modern side-mounted fingerprint scanner for easy unlocking. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic, Proximity | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity | Both phones have comprehensive sensor suites for accurate motion tracking and sensor-based features. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution, pixel density, and brightness provides a significantly better visual experience, especially outdoors.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution main, wide-angle, macro and selfie camera with a dedicated telephoto lens results in much more versatile and higher-quality photos and videos.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging gets you back up and running faster.
- Better Video Recording: Higher video recording quality with 4K and EIS gives a more professional look and smoother recordings.
- Optical Zoom: Telephoto lens provides true optical zoom without loss of image quality.
- Optical Image Stabilization: OIS helps in low-light and videography for sharper and smoother results.
Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:
- Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14 out of the box, meaning longer software support and the latest features.
- Lighter Design: The Motorola is significantly lighter making it much more ergonomic.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Modern and convenient for unlocking the phone.
- Lower Price: The G24 will likely be more affordable than the A72.
Trade-offs:
- A72 trades a newer Android Version for a significantly better display and a superior camera system.
- G24 trades a lower price and a more modern design for a less vibrant display and limited camera capabilities.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72:
- Ideal User: Media enthusiasts, photographers, users who prioritize display quality, and those needing robust camera features.
- Use Cases:
- Watching high-resolution videos and movies on the go.
- Taking detailed photos in various scenarios, including telephoto zoom.
- Regularly using the phone outdoors in bright sunlight.
- Professional users with the need for OIS.
- Price-to-Value: Offers better value for those who heavily use the camera and need a superior display, but might be more expensive overall.
Motorola Moto G24:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, people who prioritize a newer OS, those needing a light and comfortable phone for general use, and users who prefer modern design elements.
- Use Cases:
- Basic everyday smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and browsing social media.
- Users who value a lightweight phone for ease of handling.
- People who don't need advanced camera capabilities or a high-end display.
- Users who prefer more modern software and design.
- Price-to-Value: Offers good value as an affordable and newer Android smartphone for everyday use.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality? If you prioritize a vibrant and sharp display for media consumption, the A72 is the better choice.
- How much do you rely on the camera? If you need versatile camera capabilities with telephoto zoom and high-quality images, the A72 is better.
- What is your budget? If you are on a tight budget and need a newer android version, the G24 will be more cost-effective.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media Lover and Photographer: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for its superior display, advanced camera system, and OIS.
- Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious User: The Motorola Moto G24 provides a lightweight phone with a new OS at a more affordable price point.
- Scenario 3: Outdoor Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A72's bright AMOLED display will be easier to view in direct sunlight.
- Scenario 4: Casual User: If you use a phone for basic everyday use and want a light phone, the Moto G24 is a viable option.
What I Would Choose and Why
Based on the detailed analysis, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A72. While it is an older phone, its advantages in key areas significantly outweigh the benefits of the newer Motorola Moto G24.
Here's why:
Display Quality: The AMOLED display of the A72 is a game-changer. The higher resolution, pixel density, and brightness make a significant difference in everyday use, especially for media consumption, web browsing, and outdoor visibility. This superior display quality is one of the most significant differences.
Camera Performance: The A72's camera system is much more versatile. The inclusion of a telephoto lens for optical zoom, along with the higher resolution main and wide-angle cameras, allows for more creative freedom and higher-quality images and videos. The inclusion of OIS is a significant bonus for low-light photography and video stabilization.
Faster Charging: The 25W fast charging of the A72 is a practical advantage over the 15W charging of the G24. Faster charging means less time tethered to a power outlet.
Longevity: The G24 being newer is a big plus, but the A72 has proven to be a reliable device, and I'm confident it will be able to run most apps reliably.
While the Motorola Moto G24 offers a more modern design, newer OS, lighter weight and lower price, the practical benefits of the A72— superior display, superior camera capabilities, and faster charging—make it the more appealing option for my needs. I am willing to compromise the new OS for a better camera system and display.