Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Motorola Moto G23 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 107.28 cm³ 99.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 203 g 184.3 g
Height 165 mm 162.7 mm
Width 77.4 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 50.17 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Moto G23Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm162.7 × 74.7 × 8.2 mmA72 is slightly larger overall, G23 is more compact and lighter
Weight203g184.3gG23 feels more comfortable during long usage sessions
Display
Size6.7"6.5"A72 provides a slightly larger viewing area for media consumption, but both should feel similar for daily use
Resolution1080x2400720x1600A72 has a much sharper display with crisper text, images and videos, better viewing experience
PPI394270A72 has a significantly sharper display, noticeable difference in clarity
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDA72 offers better blacks, contrast, color vibrancy, and is more energy efficient, especially with dark themes
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Brightness800 nits0 nitsA72 is clearly much better for outdoor visibility and bright sunlight readability
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm)A72's chipset is more powerful, providing smoother app launching and general performance
AnTuTu Score285,000225,154A72 shows noticeably better overall performance in benchmarks, faster app loading and smoother operation
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G52 MC2A72's GPU is better for gaming, delivering smoother graphics
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life for a full day of moderate use
Charging25W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingG23 charges slightly faster
Features15W Fast Charger includedNon-removableA72 has a charger included, G23 does not have a charger explicitly noted
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8A72 captures more detailed images in good light due to higher megapixel count
Telephoto8MP, f/2.4N/AA72 offers optical zoom for better photos of distant subjects and portrait mode
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.5A72 takes more detailed selfies with better low-light performance
Wide Angle Lens12MP, f/2.25MP, f/2.2A72 captures wider scenes with much more details
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4A72 offers more detailed macro images
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS1080p@30fpsA72 records higher resolution videos and supports smoother 60fps recording for more professional video quality, the EIS helps with stabilization.
DXOMark ScoreMain 92 (photo 100, video 78)N/AA72 has a tested and proven great camera system.
Camera FeaturesOIS, Optical zoom, Night ModeTriple Camera, RAWA72 has better low light capability and zoom, G23 has better editing options with RAW support
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradeable to 12Android 13G23 offers a newer Android version, meaning more software updates, and new features.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct/Display802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi DirectA72 additionally supports Wi-Fi Display for screen sharing
Bluetooth5.05.1 LEG23 offers a newer, more power-efficient Bluetooth connection
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoG23 has wider GPS support than A72
Storage
Internal128/256GB64/128GBA72 has more internal storage options, better for large collections of media and apps
RAM6/8GB4/8GBBoth have an 8GB option but A72 has an additional 6GB RAM option
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers external storage support.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 micsG23 has additional 2 microphones that can improve audio capture
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint sensorSide-mounted Fingerprint sensorG23's side-mounted fingerprint is more modern and often faster
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, GyroscopeA72 has more sensors than G23

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: The AMOLED display with higher resolution, brightness, and pixel density offers a significantly better viewing experience, especially in bright conditions.
  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 720G chipset and higher AnTuTu score mean smoother performance, better gaming capabilities, and faster app loading.
  • More Versatile Camera: The telephoto lens, higher resolution sensors on all cameras, and OIS give A72 significant advantages in photography and video recording, especially with zoom.
  • More Internal Storage: Offers up to 256GB of storage, ideal for those who store large media files or apps.
  • Comprehensive Sensor Suite: Has additional sensors that can allow for a more advanced user experience.

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Newer Android Version: Android 13 provides the latest features and security updates.
  • Slightly Faster Charging: 30W fast charging offers a small advantage.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Slightly smaller and lighter, potentially more comfortable to hold for some users.
  • Microphones: Has 2 microphones which can be beneficial for audio recording and calls.
  • More Modern Fingerprint Sensor: The side-mounted sensor is faster and more ergonomic than the sensor used by the A72.
  • Wider GPS support: More comprehensive for navigation.

Trade-offs:

  • The Galaxy A72 trades a slightly larger design for a far superior display, better camera system, and performance while being slightly heavier.
  • The Moto G23 prioritizes newer software and a more compact design, trading overall camera and performance capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal User:

  • Media Consumers: Those who watch a lot of videos, browse social media, and play games, benefitting from the superior display and performance.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value a versatile camera system with zoom capabilities and higher resolution for photos and videos.
  • Performance Seekers: Those who need a reliable phone for multitasking and gaming.
  • Users needing storage: Benefit from more internal storage for apps, photos, and videos.

Specific Use Cases (Galaxy A72):

  • Outdoor Photography: The bright AMOLED screen and versatile camera system excel in bright conditions.
  • Mobile Gaming: The more powerful chipset and better GPU deliver smoother gameplay.
  • Video Streaming: The larger, higher resolution AMOLED display offers an immersive experience.

Motorola Moto G23 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Consumers: Those seeking a newer phone with a good display for the price.
  • Casual Users: Users who prefer a simple, reliable device for everyday use.
  • Users that prefer lighter and more compact phones: The G23 is slightly smaller and lighter than the A72.
  • Users that prioritize software updates: Newer Android version provides more software updates and new features.

Specific Use Cases (Moto G23):

  • Daily Communication: The compact design and reliable performance is suitable for calls, messaging, and browsing.
  • Basic Mobile Use: Ideal for tasks like social media, web browsing, and navigation.
  • Travelers The phone has more comprehensive GPS support.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A72 typically sits in a higher price bracket due to its superior display, camera, and performance features.
  • The Motorola Moto G23 offers a more affordable option, with a focus on essential features and newer software.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Display Quality: How important is screen resolution, brightness, and contrast for your use?
  2. Camera Needs: Do you need a versatile camera with zoom capabilities and strong low-light performance?
  3. Performance Requirements: Will you be doing heavy gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Outdoor Photography & Media: If your priorities are a bright screen, and taking lots of outdoor photos and videos, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is the better choice.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious & Casual Use: If you are on a tight budget and need a phone for basic tasks with a modern software experience, the Motorola Moto G23 offers better value.
  • Scenario 3: Performance and Gaming: For users that want a good gaming experience, and high performance, then the Samsung Galaxy A72 is the better option.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A72. While the Moto G23 is newer and offers a slightly faster charging, lighter design, and newer software, the overall user experience of the A72 is far superior. The display quality is a game-changer, offering significantly better brightness, sharpness, and vibrant colors. Combined with its more powerful chipset and better camera system, the Galaxy A72 delivers a much more enjoyable experience for daily use, content consumption, and photography. While the Moto G23 would be more affordable, the trade-offs in display, camera, and performance are too significant for me to choose over the A72. Ultimately, the A72 is the better all-round performer and provides a better value in the long run for my typical use cases.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.