1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Motorola Moto G22 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm | A72 is slightly wider; both have similar height and thickness |
| Weight | 203g | 185g | Moto G22 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | A72 has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | A72's display is significantly sharper and clearer; better for reading, viewing high-res content |
| PPI | 394 | 268 | A72 has higher pixel density, resulting in a noticeably crisper display |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A72 has superior blacks, contrast, and color vibrancy; better for overall viewing experience, especially in darker conditions |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer a smooth scrolling experience |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 0 nits | A72 has much better outdoor visibility, especially in bright sunlight (Motorola G22 spec is missing but likely not as bright) |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G (8nm) | Helio G37 (12nm) | A72's chipset is more powerful, resulting in faster app loading and smoother multitasking |
| AnTuTu Score | 285,000 | 159,800 | A72 offers much better performance for gaming and demanding apps |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | PowerVR GE8320 | A72's GPU is superior, providing smoother graphics for games and intensive applications |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 0.65µm, 1/2.76" | A72 has higher resolution on main sensor; Motorola has a smaller sensor and pixel size |
| Telephoto | 8MP, f/2.4, 1.0µm, 1/4.4" | Not available | A72 has a telephoto lens for optical zoom, better for distant shots |
| Wide Angle | 12MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Not available | A72 has a dedicated wide-angle lens for landscape shots |
| Portrait (Depth) | Not available | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Moto G22 has a depth sensor for better portrait mode |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.3, pixel size unknown | A72 has better macro lens resolution; Motorola has a slightly wider aperture |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.2, 0.8µm | 16MP, f/2.45, 1.0µm | A72 has higher resolution selfie camera; A72 has slightly wider aperture |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps, no EIS | A72 offers significantly better video recording quality and stabilization |
| DXOMark Score | Mobile: 92, Photo: 100, Video: 78 | Not available | A72 has a tested and well-rated camera performance; Moto G22 camera performance unknown |
| Features | OIS, Optical Zoom, Manual Focus, Night Mode | Laser AF | A72 has better features, especially for low light and far away images |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer comparable battery life |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 15W Fast Charging | A72 charges faster, allowing less time plugged in |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 12 | Moto G22 has a newer OS out of the box, but it is unknown if it can be upgraded |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both have similar WiFi capabilities |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 with advanced profiles | 5.0 LE | A72 offers more Bluetooth features, providing better connectivity with peripherals |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | A72 supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Single SIM | A72 allows using two SIM cards simultaneously |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256 GB | 64/128 GB | A72 offers more storage options (up to 256 GB), better for storing more media and files |
| RAM | 6/8 GB | 4 GB | A72's higher RAM provides smoother multitasking and overall better performance |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Basic Audio Features | A72 delivers a much better audio experience, good for media consumption |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G22 has more user-friendly fingerprint sensor |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint, Geomagnetic, Hall | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint, Barometer | Moto G22 has a barometer; A72 has hall and geomagnetic sensor |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, higher pixel density, and significantly better brightness make the display much better for viewing content, especially outdoors.
- Better Performance: A more powerful processor and GPU, coupled with more RAM, lead to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming experience.
- Advanced Camera System: Telephoto, wide-angle lenses, higher resolution on main and selfie cameras, OIS, optical zoom, and superior video capabilities (4K recording and EIS) provide greater versatility and quality in photography and videography.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging allows the phone to get charged more quickly.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and stereo speakers offer a significantly more immersive audio experience.
- More Internal Storage: Up to 256GB of storage available
Motorola Moto G22 Advantages:
- Lighter Design: The Moto G22 is lighter, which is better for users who prioritize comfort during prolonged use.
- Newer OS Out of the Box: Comes with Android 12 out of the box.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Some users may find a side-mounted fingerprint sensor more convenient than the in-display option.
- Barometer Sensor: Inclusion of a barometer sensor is a plus for users interested in weather or atmospheric data.
- Potentially Lower Cost: Motorola phones in this category often come at a lower price point than Samsung's
Significant Trade-offs:
- Display Quality: The Moto G22's display is a significant downgrade compared to the A72's AMOLED panel, resulting in less vibrant colors, poorer clarity, and lower outdoor visibility.
- Performance Gap: The G22’s processor and GPU are notably less powerful, which may result in lag and slower performance for demanding apps and games.
- Camera Limitations: The lack of a telephoto and wide-angle lens, coupled with lower-resolution sensors and video capabilities, makes the G22 less versatile in photography and videography.
- Charging Speed: The G22 charges slower compared to the A72.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A72 Ideal Users:
- Media Enthusiasts: Users who watch videos, movies, and play games on their phones. The superior AMOLED display, stereo speakers, and powerful performance make it ideal for content consumption.
- Photography Lovers: Those who value camera versatility and image quality. The telephoto and wide-angle lenses, along with 4K video recording, allow for more creative and high-quality shots.
- Power Users: Users who multitask frequently and run demanding apps. The stronger processor, GPU, and more RAM will result in a smoother overall experience.
Frequent Travelers: The dual-SIM capability and better GPS accuracy are ideal for those who need to manage multiple SIMs and rely on navigation.
Specific Use Cases:
- Watching HD content on the go
- Taking photos and videos in various situations
- Playing graphics-intensive mobile games
- Using multiple apps simultaneously
- Long commutes or travel requiring reliable navigation
Motorola Moto G22 Ideal Users:
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Those who need a functional smartphone for basic tasks without spending a lot of money.
- Users Prioritizing Lightness: People who prefer a lighter phone and find it more comfortable for day-to-day usage.
- Basic Smartphone Users: Individuals who primarily use their phone for calling, messaging, social media, and web browsing, without heavy gaming or media consumption.
Users who need newer android version: Users that require the newest version of android.
Specific Use Cases:
- Basic social media browsing and messaging
- General web browsing
- Calling and communication
- Using GPS for basic navigation
- Simple photography for everyday use.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality and outdoor visibility to you? (If high-quality display is a priority, the A72 is the clear winner.)
- How often do you play games or use demanding apps? (If gaming is important or you frequently run multiple apps, the A72's superior performance will be beneficial.)
- What are your photography needs? (If you need versatility and quality, especially optical zoom, and video, the A72 is significantly better.)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget is the primary concern, and you just want a basic smartphone: Choose the Motorola Moto G22. It offers essential functions and a lighter design at a potentially lower price.
- Scenario 2: You value a high-quality display and want to enjoy media and play games on the go: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72. Its AMOLED display, better performance, and enhanced audio make it ideal.
- Scenario 3: You are an avid photographer who uses your phone as a primary camera: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72. The versatile camera system and video capabilities are significantly better.
- Scenario 4: You require the latest software available, and will not be upset by decreased performance: Choose the Motorola Moto G22. It has android 12 out of the box
My Choice
Given the analysis, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A72. Although it is older, the significant advantages in display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and overall user experience outweigh the fact that it is an older model and it is slightly heavier. As someone who values high-quality media consumption, photography, and smooth multitasking, the A72 provides a much more complete and satisfying experience. While the Moto G22 has some advantages such as being lighter and having newer software, they are not significant enough to compromise on the overall performance and feature-rich experience provided by the A72. The better camera system and display are extremely important factors for me, making it the preferred option despite the higher price point.
