Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 26, 2021 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 107.28 cm³ 95.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 203 g 186 g
Height 165 mm 161.2 mm
Width 77.4 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Luxe Lavender
  • Black Beauty
  • Moonlight Pearl

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 92.8 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.61 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 618 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm161.2 × 72.4 × 8.2 mmThe Motorola is smaller, making it more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight203g186gThe Motorola is lighter, reducing fatigue during extended use.
BuildSpecific build materials not listedSpecific build materials not listedWithout specific materials, it's hard to assess robustness and feel. Motorola has Corning Gorilla Glass Victus screen protection.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.7"Both phones offer the same screen size.
Resolution1080x24001220x2712The Motorola has a noticeably sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
PPI394446The Motorola's higher pixel density makes the display look crisper and more detailed.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth technologies offer vibrant colors and good contrast. P-OLED is considered a very similar quality display technology to AMOLED.
Refresh Rate90Hz144HzThe Motorola's display is significantly smoother, improving the experience of scrolling, animations and gaming.
Brightness800 nits2000 nitsThe Motorola's screen is much brighter, vastly improving visibility in sunlight.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)The Motorola has a much more powerful and efficient processor, resulting in better overall performance, smoother multitasking and gaming, and improved battery life due to more efficient architecture.
Antutu Score285,000866,863The Motorola offers dramatically higher performance, making apps and games much faster.
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 720The Motorola's GPU provides substantially better graphics performance for gaming and graphics-intensive applications.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8, 0.80 µm50MP, f/1.4, 2.00 µmThe Motorola's larger pixels and wider aperture should allow for better low-light performance, despite a lower megapixel count. The Samsung has a slightly higher resolution which might be beneficial in well-lit conditions.
Telephoto8MP, f/2.4, 1.00 µm10MP, f/2.0, 1.00 µmBoth offer telephoto capabilities, useful for zoomed photography with similar pixel size. Motorola's sensor has a wider aperture, potentially better in lower light. The Motorola also has this as a dedicated lens, while the Samsung has a combined telephoto + portrait lens.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.2, 0.80 µm50MP, f/1.9, 0.64 µmThe Motorola's higher resolution and wider aperture offer potentially better detail and low light performance for selfies, despite smaller pixel size.
Wide Angle12MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µmBoth offer very similar wide angle lenses with very similar specs.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4, 1.12 µmNot presentSamsung has a dedicated macro lens, enabling closeup photography. Motorola lacks a dedicated macro lens.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 4K@30fps with HDR, EIS, 1080p@120fps with HDR, EISThe Motorola provides HDR video and higher framerates in 1080p, offering more flexibility in video recording.
DxOMarkMobile: 92, Photo: 100, Video: 78Not testedThe Samsung has a higher tested photo score, but no video benchmark.
FeaturesQuadruple camera, OISTriple camera, OIS, Time-Lapse, 4K Video, Continuous autofocus, Dual capture, RAWBoth offer OIS and autofocus. Motorola adds 4k Video, Time-Lapse, RAW capabilities and continuous autofocus, while Samsung offers a dedicated macro lens.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh4500mAhThe Samsung has a larger battery, suggesting potentially longer battery life between charges.
Charging25W fast charging125W fast charging, 50W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless chargingThe Motorola charges much faster and offers wireless and reverse wireless charging, offering superior versatility.
Features15W fast charger includedReverse charging, 50W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless chargingThe Motorola has multiple charging capabilities, while Samsung only has a charger included in the box.

Software

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 14 (upgradable to 17)The Motorola has a much newer OS, offering access to latest features and security patches. It also has much longer software support.

Connectivity

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be/6EThe Motorola supports the newest WiFi standards with much higher speed, lower latency, and access to more bands (6GHz), which makes it much better for downloading and uploading large files.
Bluetooth5.05.4 LEThe Motorola has a newer version with better power efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5a), NavIC SystemThe Motorola has more accurate and faster GPS due to better satellite support, resulting in more accurate navigation.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMThe Motorola offers the option of using a digital SIM.

Storage

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Internal128GB or 256GB256GB, 512GB or 1024 GBThe Motorola has more options for storage, especially higher storage, allowing you to store large numbers of files and videos.
RAM6GB or 8GB12GB or 16GBThe Motorola has more RAM, leading to smoother multitasking, especially useful when running several apps in the background.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for external storage.

Audio

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 MicrophonesThe Motorola's three microphones provides better audio recording and noise cancellation, leading to better audio quality during calls or video recording.

Security

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
FeaturesFingerprint sensorFingerprint sensorBoth phones have the same fingerprint sensor type for basic security.

Build Quality

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusThe Motorola screen is much more resistant to scratches and damage.

Sensors

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A72Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, GeomagneticFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeThe Samsung has additional Hall and Geomagnetic sensors, but for most users the sensor suites are similar.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The newer Snapdragon chipset offers dramatically faster processing and graphics, leading to a smoother experience.
  • Superior display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness result in a sharper, smoother, and more visible display, especially in outdoor conditions.
  • Much faster charging: 125W wired and 50W wireless charging provide significantly faster charging times compared to the Samsung's 25W charging.
  • Better camera features: The camera system is more flexible, with features such as 4K video, RAW, Time-Lapse, better low light performance, and continuous autofocus.
  • Newer software: Comes with a more recent version of Android with longer software update support.
  • More modern connectivity: Supports newer WiFi 7 standards, Bluetooth 5.4 LE, and more accurate GPS.
  • Better audio: 3 microphones allows for better sound recording and noise cancellation.
  • Better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus protects against scratches and damage.

Practical Implications: The Motorola is significantly more future-proof with its superior performance, modern connectivity, and software. It provides a better experience for gaming, video recording, and general usage with a display that's brighter and smoother.

Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The A72 has a 500 mAh larger battery which might give it slightly longer battery life.
  • Macro lens: A dedicated macro lens enables close-up photography, which is missing on the Motorola.
  • Higher rated main camera in daylight conditions: The A72 has a slightly higher megapixel count on its main camera, which might offer slight benefits in optimal conditions.

Practical Implications: The Samsung Galaxy A72's advantages are less significant, with the larger battery only having minor practical benefits. The additional macro lens might be helpful for niche users interested in close-up photography.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A72 is notably slower and has a much older OS compared to the Motorola.
  • The Motorola's superior charging speed and wireless capabilities mean it's more convenient and charges much faster.
  • The Samsung lacks key features that the Motorola has, such as RAW camera output, time-lapse mode, and advanced WiFi and GPS features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Motorola Edge 50 Pro:

  • Power Users: People who demand fast performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Content Creators: Users who shoot a lot of video, including in low-light conditions, and need fast charging.
  • Media Consumers: Users who value a high-quality display with smooth refresh rates for enjoyable video and gaming experiences.
  • Tech Enthusiasts: People who want the latest connectivity features, such as WiFi 7, Bluetooth 5.4 LE, and the most up to date software.
  • Travelers: Users who want the latest GPS and eSIM features, plus a highly resistant screen with the latest protection.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Gaming: High refresh rate, powerful GPU, and fast charging.
  • Video recording: Better low-light capability, 4K video, and continuous autofocus.
  • Outdoor use: Very bright display for visibility in direct sunlight.

Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A72:

  • Budget Conscious users: Users who are trying to spend the least amount possible, and are ok with old hardware, slower performance and not having the newest features.
  • Users who like macro photography: People who need a dedicated macro lens for close up photography.
  • Users who prefer Samsung: People who like Samsung devices.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Casual use: Basic tasks such as browsing the web and social media, and don't need the newest and fastest features.
  • Macro photography: Users who frequently take pictures of very small objects.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola Edge 50 Pro offers significantly better value for the price due to its superior performance, display, and features.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A72, while potentially cheaper, offers a much worse experience, and is much less future-proof.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance and responsiveness? If smooth multitasking and fast app loading are priorities, the Motorola is the clear winner.
  2. What are your display needs? If you prioritize a clear, smooth, and bright display, especially for outdoor use, the Motorola stands out.
  3. How often do you record video, and is fast charging important? For frequent video recording and the need for quick charging, the Motorola is the better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For Gamers or Heavy Users: Choose the Motorola Edge 50 Pro for its superior processing power, display, and charging capabilities.
  • For Casual Users on a Budget: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for a more affordable option, but be aware of its outdated technology and slower performance.
  • For Content Creators: The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the preferred device due to its better camera capabilities, including 4K video, RAW and superior low light, and fast charging.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The performance difference is enormous. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro's modern chipset, superior display, and much faster charging makes it a significantly better phone for modern usage. While the Samsung Galaxy A72 may have a slightly larger battery and dedicated macro lens, these are niche advantages, while the Motorola is vastly superior for everyday use with a much better screen, performance, faster charging, and better software support. The Edge 50 Pro is more future-proof, and will offer a much more enjoyable experience for the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.